Lebensform and “socio-cultural background”

Marcin Baran
{"title":"Lebensform and “socio-cultural background”","authors":"Marcin Baran","doi":"10.1515/witt-2018-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The main part of the philosophical activity of Charles Taylor may be characterized as philosophical anthropology. This philosophical anthropology is above all an attempt to overcome what he calls the epistemological construal i. e. a set of false anthropological beliefs spread in the modern western philosophy like: disengaged subject, the punctual self and social atomism. His critique of the anthropological beliefs draws, among other thinkers, heavily on Ludwig Wittgenstein's reflections on language and his social nature in Philosophical Investigations. To the disengaged subject and punctual self Taylor opposes the embodied subject, a human agent that is impossible to define without his language depending entirely on the “form of life”, an inescapable social context in which he is embedded. Thus Taylor emphasizes the basic connection between the self and the community, which is being falsely compromised by social atomism. This emphasis on the community, on the essential role of the link between individual and his social environment rank him among so called communitarians, the critics of the predominant individualistic liberal way of thinking. In his more recent works, especially A Secular Age Taylor reflects on the phenomenon of secularization of the modern West. Here the notion, inspired partially by Wittgenstein, of “background” – an implicit framework for the beliefs of an agent – plays an important role. The following text will show more in detail the most important Wittgensteinian inspirations in the philosophical reflection of Charles Taylor considering modern western culture.","PeriodicalId":141976,"journal":{"name":"Wittgenstein-Studien","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wittgenstein-Studien","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2018-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The main part of the philosophical activity of Charles Taylor may be characterized as philosophical anthropology. This philosophical anthropology is above all an attempt to overcome what he calls the epistemological construal i. e. a set of false anthropological beliefs spread in the modern western philosophy like: disengaged subject, the punctual self and social atomism. His critique of the anthropological beliefs draws, among other thinkers, heavily on Ludwig Wittgenstein's reflections on language and his social nature in Philosophical Investigations. To the disengaged subject and punctual self Taylor opposes the embodied subject, a human agent that is impossible to define without his language depending entirely on the “form of life”, an inescapable social context in which he is embedded. Thus Taylor emphasizes the basic connection between the self and the community, which is being falsely compromised by social atomism. This emphasis on the community, on the essential role of the link between individual and his social environment rank him among so called communitarians, the critics of the predominant individualistic liberal way of thinking. In his more recent works, especially A Secular Age Taylor reflects on the phenomenon of secularization of the modern West. Here the notion, inspired partially by Wittgenstein, of “background” – an implicit framework for the beliefs of an agent – plays an important role. The following text will show more in detail the most important Wittgensteinian inspirations in the philosophical reflection of Charles Taylor considering modern western culture.
生存空间与“社会文化背景”
摘要:查尔斯·泰勒的哲学活动的主要部分可以概括为哲学人类学。这种哲学人类学首先是试图克服他所谓的认识论解释。现代西方哲学中流传着一套错误的人类学信念,如:脱离主体、准时自我和社会原子论。在其他思想家中,他对人类学信仰的批判主要借鉴了路德维希·维特根斯坦(Ludwig Wittgenstein)在《哲学研究》中对语言及其社会本质的反思。对于脱离的主体和准时的自我,泰勒反对具体化的主体,一个没有他的语言就不可能完全依赖于“生活形式”来定义的人类代理人,这是一个他所处的不可避免的社会环境。因此,泰勒强调自我与社会之间的基本联系,这种联系被社会原子论错误地妥协了。这种对共同体的强调,对个人与其社会环境之间联系的重要作用的强调,使他跻身于所谓的共同体主义者之列,这是对占主导地位的个人主义自由主义思维方式的批评。在他最近的作品中,尤其是《世俗时代》,泰勒反思了现代西方的世俗化现象。在这里,部分受到维特根斯坦(Wittgenstein)启发的“背景”概念——一个主体信仰的隐含框架——发挥了重要作用。下面的文本将更详细地展示维特根斯坦在查尔斯·泰勒考虑现代西方文化的哲学反思中最重要的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信