Ratification Debates

M. W. McConnell
{"title":"Ratification Debates","authors":"M. W. McConnell","doi":"10.23943/princeton/9780691207520.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter begins with the executive branch that attracted less attention than other issues and the controversy that had little to do with the details of presidential authority. It points out that there wasn't much discussion about what the various provisions bearing on executive power meant as participants focused on whether those powers were benign or dangerous. It also refers to the speakers who catalogued the powers of the executive that simply quoted or paraphrased the language of Article II, without any serious attempts at exposition. The chapter talks about Herbert Storing, the leading scholar of Anti-Federalist thought who noted that some Anti-Federalists defended the presidency and thought the office should have been made stronger as an antidote to the aristocratic Senate. It details five state-ratifying conventions that proposed more than fifty amendments related to the powers of the presidency, such as barring pardons in treason cases.","PeriodicalId":252767,"journal":{"name":"The President Who Would Not Be King","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The President Who Would Not Be King","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691207520.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter begins with the executive branch that attracted less attention than other issues and the controversy that had little to do with the details of presidential authority. It points out that there wasn't much discussion about what the various provisions bearing on executive power meant as participants focused on whether those powers were benign or dangerous. It also refers to the speakers who catalogued the powers of the executive that simply quoted or paraphrased the language of Article II, without any serious attempts at exposition. The chapter talks about Herbert Storing, the leading scholar of Anti-Federalist thought who noted that some Anti-Federalists defended the presidency and thought the office should have been made stronger as an antidote to the aristocratic Senate. It details five state-ratifying conventions that proposed more than fifty amendments related to the powers of the presidency, such as barring pardons in treason cases.
批准的辩论
这一章从行政部门开始,它比其他问题更不受关注,与总统权力的细节关系不大的争议。它指出,由于与会者关注的是这些权力是良性的还是危险的,因此没有太多讨论与行政权力有关的各种条款的含义。它还指那些把行政权力编入目录的发言者,他们只是引用或改述第二条的措辞,而没有任何认真的阐述。这一章谈到了反联邦主义思想的主要学者赫伯特·斯托林(Herbert storage),他指出,一些反联邦主义者为总统职位辩护,认为总统职位应该加强,以对抗贵族参议院。它详细介绍了五个州批准公约,这些公约提出了50多项与总统权力有关的修正案,比如禁止对叛国罪的赦免。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信