{"title":"Uruguayan Theater in Exile","authors":"Luciana Scaraffuni","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between 1968 and 1985, Uruguay experienced the twelve most tragic years of its history, due to the establishment of a civic–military dictatorship (1973–1985); such dictatorships came to power in various Southern Cone countries at that time: Brazil (1964), Bolivia (1971), Uruguay (1973), Chile (1973), and Argentina (1976).\n In Uruguay, the roots of political violence were present before the dictatorial period, though such violence was consolidated during this time (1973 to 1985). In 1968 a state of exception was established in the country through the implementation of what were called the Medidas Prontas de Seguridad and the pro-military actions of the Jorge Pacheco Areco administration (1967–1972). Subsequent years were characterized by the consolidation of the regime under the democratically elected president Juan María Bordaberry, who commanded the dissolution of the legislature on June 27, 1973.\n Due to the persecution, kidnapping, imprisonment, and disappearance of a large proportion of the population resulting from this, many Uruguayans went into exile. The experiences of a group of teatreros and teatreras, or theater workers, belonging to the El Galpón theater company, who went into exile in Mexico in 1976, are of particular interest.\n Exile interpellated this group of teatreros and teatreras in various ways, by examining the cultural context, the political context, and the material conditions in which the Galponeros lived in Mexico. It also takes into account that the experience of exile led to different forms of theater work for the group. Throughout, it is necessary to understand the relationship between “the national” and “the Latin American,” to distinguish them in some way, in reference to aspects that influenced the group’s theatrical production and construction both in Mexico and on its return to Uruguay.\n Similarly, members’ private lives are of interest, since the experience of exile, in addition to resignifying the theatrical work of the group, meant that the teatreros and teatreras experienced the rupturing of their daily lives and their “life world,” including the disintegration of families and their reconstruction in the countries of exile, in which the exiles formed new ties and family groups.","PeriodicalId":190332,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Between 1968 and 1985, Uruguay experienced the twelve most tragic years of its history, due to the establishment of a civic–military dictatorship (1973–1985); such dictatorships came to power in various Southern Cone countries at that time: Brazil (1964), Bolivia (1971), Uruguay (1973), Chile (1973), and Argentina (1976).
In Uruguay, the roots of political violence were present before the dictatorial period, though such violence was consolidated during this time (1973 to 1985). In 1968 a state of exception was established in the country through the implementation of what were called the Medidas Prontas de Seguridad and the pro-military actions of the Jorge Pacheco Areco administration (1967–1972). Subsequent years were characterized by the consolidation of the regime under the democratically elected president Juan María Bordaberry, who commanded the dissolution of the legislature on June 27, 1973.
Due to the persecution, kidnapping, imprisonment, and disappearance of a large proportion of the population resulting from this, many Uruguayans went into exile. The experiences of a group of teatreros and teatreras, or theater workers, belonging to the El Galpón theater company, who went into exile in Mexico in 1976, are of particular interest.
Exile interpellated this group of teatreros and teatreras in various ways, by examining the cultural context, the political context, and the material conditions in which the Galponeros lived in Mexico. It also takes into account that the experience of exile led to different forms of theater work for the group. Throughout, it is necessary to understand the relationship between “the national” and “the Latin American,” to distinguish them in some way, in reference to aspects that influenced the group’s theatrical production and construction both in Mexico and on its return to Uruguay.
Similarly, members’ private lives are of interest, since the experience of exile, in addition to resignifying the theatrical work of the group, meant that the teatreros and teatreras experienced the rupturing of their daily lives and their “life world,” including the disintegration of families and their reconstruction in the countries of exile, in which the exiles formed new ties and family groups.
1968年至1985年期间,乌拉圭经历了其历史上最悲惨的12年,原因是建立了一个文武独裁政权(1973年至1985年);当时这样的独裁统治在南锥体的许多国家出现:巴西(1964年)、玻利维亚(1971年)、乌拉圭(1973年)、智利(1973年)和阿根廷(1976年)。在乌拉圭,政治暴力的根源在独裁时期之前就存在了,尽管这种暴力在这段时间(1973年至1985年)得到了巩固。1968年,通过实施所谓的Medidas Prontas de Seguridad和豪尔赫·帕切科·阿雷科政府(1967-1972)的亲军事行动,该国建立了一个例外状态。随后几年的特点是在民主选举的总统胡安María博尔达贝里领导下巩固政权,他于1973年6月27日下令解散立法机关。由于迫害、绑架、监禁和大量人口的失踪,许多乌拉圭人被流放。1976年流亡墨西哥的El Galpón剧团的一群戏剧演员和戏剧工作者的经历特别有趣。通过考察Galponeros在墨西哥生活的文化背景、政治背景和物质条件,Exile以各种方式询问了这群戏剧演员和戏剧演员。它还考虑到流亡的经历导致了不同形式的戏剧工作的团体。在整个过程中,有必要了解“民族”和“拉丁美洲”之间的关系,以某种方式区分它们,参考影响该团体在墨西哥和返回乌拉圭的戏剧制作和建设的方面。同样,成员的私人生活也很有趣,因为流亡的经历,除了对群体的戏剧工作的辞职,意味着戏剧家和剧院经历了他们日常生活和“生活世界”的破裂,包括家庭的解体和他们在流亡国家的重建,流亡者在其中形成了新的关系和家庭群体。