Something Worth Dying For?

A. Blunden
{"title":"Something Worth Dying For?","authors":"A. Blunden","doi":"10.1163/9789004470972_017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perhaps the most challenging thing about the foreign fighters – those people who disappear from their suburban homes and reappear on Facebook in Syria or Iraq carrying a grenade launcher or wearing a suicide jacket – is that they evidently have something they think is worth dying for. Probably most of us would lay down our lives for our immediate family. Beyond that, Anzac Day parades and endless military posturing by political leaders notwithstanding, it is difficult to imagine most people in this country genuinely willing to put their life on the line for Democracy, Australia, Socialism, the Liberal Party, Jesus or anything else. Not that people wouldn’t fight like hell to hang on to what they have, but willing to put their life on the line for an idea? A society which cannot give its young people an idea worth dying for is what is really shocking. What a shame it is the lengths foreign fighters go to to find something worth sacrificing their life for. The suicide bomber may be misguided, but unless there’s something worth dying for how can there be something worth living for? I will briefly review the rise of foreign fighters through the lens of collaborative projects, a unit of analysis which is particularly useful for understanding this phenomenon. Collaborative projects, or ‘projects’ for short, are entities which people join rather than launch themselves, in the overwhelming majority of cases. A project differs from a group. A group is a collection of people united by some attribute such as ethnicity or beliefs, but a project is an aggregate of actions directed towards the collaborative realization of an ideal. All those entities which motivate actions which do not satisfy a person’s immediate needs are projects. A foreign fighter is someone who participates in an insurgency but has neither citizenship nor kinship links in the war zone and has travelled from afar as a private citizen to fight as an unpaid volunteer. Foreign fighters are quite distinct from terrorists who carry out violent acts outside of any war zone and those who travel overseas to attend a terrorist training camp. Foreign fighters are engaged in conventional warfare. Before you can become a foreign fighter, someone has to be waging an insurgency that you can join. I will deal with the ‘demand side’ of foreign fighting first, where I rely on the work of Thomas Hegghammer (2011), before turning to the ‘supply side’ where I rely on a variety of sources.","PeriodicalId":320224,"journal":{"name":"Hegel, Marx and Vygotsky","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hegel, Marx and Vygotsky","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004470972_017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Perhaps the most challenging thing about the foreign fighters – those people who disappear from their suburban homes and reappear on Facebook in Syria or Iraq carrying a grenade launcher or wearing a suicide jacket – is that they evidently have something they think is worth dying for. Probably most of us would lay down our lives for our immediate family. Beyond that, Anzac Day parades and endless military posturing by political leaders notwithstanding, it is difficult to imagine most people in this country genuinely willing to put their life on the line for Democracy, Australia, Socialism, the Liberal Party, Jesus or anything else. Not that people wouldn’t fight like hell to hang on to what they have, but willing to put their life on the line for an idea? A society which cannot give its young people an idea worth dying for is what is really shocking. What a shame it is the lengths foreign fighters go to to find something worth sacrificing their life for. The suicide bomber may be misguided, but unless there’s something worth dying for how can there be something worth living for? I will briefly review the rise of foreign fighters through the lens of collaborative projects, a unit of analysis which is particularly useful for understanding this phenomenon. Collaborative projects, or ‘projects’ for short, are entities which people join rather than launch themselves, in the overwhelming majority of cases. A project differs from a group. A group is a collection of people united by some attribute such as ethnicity or beliefs, but a project is an aggregate of actions directed towards the collaborative realization of an ideal. All those entities which motivate actions which do not satisfy a person’s immediate needs are projects. A foreign fighter is someone who participates in an insurgency but has neither citizenship nor kinship links in the war zone and has travelled from afar as a private citizen to fight as an unpaid volunteer. Foreign fighters are quite distinct from terrorists who carry out violent acts outside of any war zone and those who travel overseas to attend a terrorist training camp. Foreign fighters are engaged in conventional warfare. Before you can become a foreign fighter, someone has to be waging an insurgency that you can join. I will deal with the ‘demand side’ of foreign fighting first, where I rely on the work of Thomas Hegghammer (2011), before turning to the ‘supply side’ where I rely on a variety of sources.
值得为之牺牲的东西?
对于那些从郊区的家中消失,然后在Facebook上出现在叙利亚或伊拉克的外国战士来说,最具挑战性的事情可能是,他们显然有一些他们认为值得为之牺牲的东西。也许我们中的大多数人会为我们的直系亲属献出生命。除此之外,尽管澳新军团日的游行和政治领导人无休止的军事姿态,很难想象这个国家的大多数人真的愿意为民主、澳大利亚、社会主义、自由党、耶稣或其他任何东西献出生命。并不是说人们不会为了保住现有的东西而拼尽全力,而是说他们愿意为了一个想法冒生命危险?一个社会不能给年轻人一个值得为之献身的理念,这才是真正令人震惊的。外国战士为了寻找值得牺牲生命的东西而付出的代价是多么的可耻。自杀式炸弹袭击者可能被误导了,但除非有值得为之牺牲的东西,否则怎么会有值得为之活着的东西呢?我将通过合作项目的视角简要回顾外国战士的崛起,合作项目是一个分析单元,对理解这一现象特别有用。在绝大多数情况下,协作项目(简称“项目”)是人们加入而不是自己发起的实体。一个项目不同于一个团队。团体是由种族或信仰等属性联合起来的一群人,而项目则是为了共同实现理想而采取的行动的集合。所有那些能激发行动但不能满足人的直接需求的实体都是项目。外国战士是指那些参与叛乱但在战区既没有公民身份也没有亲属关系的人,他们作为一名普通公民远道而来,作为一名无偿志愿者参加战斗。外国战斗人员与在任何战区以外实施暴力行为的恐怖分子以及前往海外参加恐怖主义训练营的恐怖分子截然不同。外国战斗人员从事的是常规战争。在你成为一名外国战士之前,必须有人发动一场你可以加入的叛乱。我将首先处理外国战斗的“需求面”,我依赖于托马斯·海格哈默(2011)的工作,然后转向“供给面”,我依赖于各种来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信