ПРАВОВЕ РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ПРАВ ЛЮДИНИ, НАРОДУ І НАЦІЙ В УКРАЇНІ

В. О. Процевський, В. І. Горбань
{"title":"ПРАВОВЕ РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ПРАВ ЛЮДИНИ, НАРОДУ І НАЦІЙ В УКРАЇНІ","authors":"В. О. Процевський, В. І. Горбань","doi":"10.34142/23121661.2019.30.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to find ways of overcoming the etatistician legal tradition of regulating human rights in Ukraine in relation to the rights of the nation and the people. The contradictions between the articles of the Constitution of Ukraine on a person and his rights with his articles on restriction of human rights are revealed; between articles about the Ukrainian people and articles about the nation and national interests. The causal relationship between the positivist understanding of law as established and regulated by the state and the practice of legal regulation of human rights, the nation and the people as subjective objects, and not the natural subjects of civil society and the state - theirs, is investigated. servant. Alternative legal regulation based on the dialectic of the individual (person), special (nation), general (people) with the defining role of the people in the law, which includes not only legislation, but also norms of morality, customs, traditions, treaties, is argued. The ideological extremes of legal regulation are criticized: the hypertrophy of anthropocentrism and the sovereignty of the people. The key importance of the elimination of poverty of the people and the creation of a majority of middle-class middle-class majority for the achievement of the main goal of legal regulation of human rights, nation and people – to ensure their freedom is substantiated. As a result of the study, conclusions are drawn: on the advisability of adopting an official legal doctrine in Ukraine on the basis of modern European law of understanding as a source of law; on scientific development of subjects of non-state legal regulation; on amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine regarding the relation between the concepts of nations and peoples and the possibility of limiting a person not in rights, but in their implementation; on the criteria for the equitable legal regulation of mutual human rights, the nation and the people: its fullest endorsement by the majority of these entities as equal in their rights on the basis of the widest consensus between them throughout Ukraine and its individual regions and a steady tendency to increase the middle class in composition people.","PeriodicalId":189398,"journal":{"name":"Збірник наукових праць ХНПУ імені Г. С. Сковороди \"Право\"","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Збірник наукових праць ХНПУ імені Г. С. Сковороди \"Право\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34142/23121661.2019.30.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to find ways of overcoming the etatistician legal tradition of regulating human rights in Ukraine in relation to the rights of the nation and the people. The contradictions between the articles of the Constitution of Ukraine on a person and his rights with his articles on restriction of human rights are revealed; between articles about the Ukrainian people and articles about the nation and national interests. The causal relationship between the positivist understanding of law as established and regulated by the state and the practice of legal regulation of human rights, the nation and the people as subjective objects, and not the natural subjects of civil society and the state - theirs, is investigated. servant. Alternative legal regulation based on the dialectic of the individual (person), special (nation), general (people) with the defining role of the people in the law, which includes not only legislation, but also norms of morality, customs, traditions, treaties, is argued. The ideological extremes of legal regulation are criticized: the hypertrophy of anthropocentrism and the sovereignty of the people. The key importance of the elimination of poverty of the people and the creation of a majority of middle-class middle-class majority for the achievement of the main goal of legal regulation of human rights, nation and people – to ensure their freedom is substantiated. As a result of the study, conclusions are drawn: on the advisability of adopting an official legal doctrine in Ukraine on the basis of modern European law of understanding as a source of law; on scientific development of subjects of non-state legal regulation; on amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine regarding the relation between the concepts of nations and peoples and the possibility of limiting a person not in rights, but in their implementation; on the criteria for the equitable legal regulation of mutual human rights, the nation and the people: its fullest endorsement by the majority of these entities as equal in their rights on the basis of the widest consensus between them throughout Ukraine and its individual regions and a steady tendency to increase the middle class in composition people.
这项研究的目的是找到克服乌克兰与国家和人民权利有关的规范人权的统计学家法律传统的方法。揭示了乌克兰宪法中关于个人及其权利的条款与其限制人权的条款之间的矛盾;在关于乌克兰人民的文章和关于国家和国家利益的文章之间。实证主义的法律理解是由国家建立和规范的,与人权的法律规制实践之间的因果关系,国家和人民作为主观客体,而不是公民社会和国家的自然主体。仆人。基于个体(人)、特殊(国家)、一般(人)的辩证法,以人在法律中的定义作用为基础,论证了替代性法律规制,它不仅包括立法,还包括道德规范、习俗、传统、条约等。对法律规制的意识形态极端:人类中心主义的臃肿和人民主权的主张进行了批判。消除人民的贫困和创造中产阶级多数的中产阶级多数对于实现法律规定人权、国家和人民- -确保其自由的主要目标的关键重要性得到了证实。研究结果得出以下结论:在乌克兰以现代欧洲理解法作为法律渊源的基础上采用官方法律学说的可取性;论非国家法律规制主体的科学发展关于修改乌克兰宪法关于国家和人民概念之间的关系以及限制一个人的权利而不是权利的执行的可能性的问题;在平等法律规范相互人权、国家和人民的标准上:这些实体中的大多数在乌克兰全境及其个别地区最广泛的协商一致意见的基础上,充分认可其权利平等,并且中产阶级在人口构成中有稳定的增长趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信