Detention

D. Fairgrieve, Dan Squires QC
{"title":"Detention","authors":"D. Fairgrieve, Dan Squires QC","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199692552.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public authorities are responsible for detaining individuals in a variety of situations. The police, prison authorities, and health authorities treating the mentally ill, are all empowered to confine people against their will. Given the almost complete control such authorities have over the detainees’ environment, and the dependence of the detainees on the authority to provide for their daily needs, it is foreseeable that in various circumstances the carelessness of the authority will harm those detained. This chapter considers the potential liability in negligence of detaining authorities. Negligence is not, however, the only, or even the most important, tort available to detainees. They may also be able to hold detaining authorities liable for the torts of assault and battery, misfeasance in public office, and false imprisonment, as well as various claims for breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. As this chapter explains, the tort of negligence often operates as a residual remedy where one of these other remedies is not available to a detainee. Another kind of negligence liability this chapter considers arises where harm is caused by the detainees themselves. Given that some of those detained may be dangerous, it is foreseeable that if they are incorrectly released or allowed to escape they will cause harm. This chapter examines whether those injured by detainees in such circumstances can hold the detaining authority liable in negligence. The possibility of the victims succeeding in claims for breach of the European Convention on Human Rights is such cases is considered in Chapter 7.","PeriodicalId":147937,"journal":{"name":"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities, Second Edition","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities, Second Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199692552.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public authorities are responsible for detaining individuals in a variety of situations. The police, prison authorities, and health authorities treating the mentally ill, are all empowered to confine people against their will. Given the almost complete control such authorities have over the detainees’ environment, and the dependence of the detainees on the authority to provide for their daily needs, it is foreseeable that in various circumstances the carelessness of the authority will harm those detained. This chapter considers the potential liability in negligence of detaining authorities. Negligence is not, however, the only, or even the most important, tort available to detainees. They may also be able to hold detaining authorities liable for the torts of assault and battery, misfeasance in public office, and false imprisonment, as well as various claims for breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. As this chapter explains, the tort of negligence often operates as a residual remedy where one of these other remedies is not available to a detainee. Another kind of negligence liability this chapter considers arises where harm is caused by the detainees themselves. Given that some of those detained may be dangerous, it is foreseeable that if they are incorrectly released or allowed to escape they will cause harm. This chapter examines whether those injured by detainees in such circumstances can hold the detaining authority liable in negligence. The possibility of the victims succeeding in claims for breach of the European Convention on Human Rights is such cases is considered in Chapter 7.
拘留
公共当局负责在各种情况下拘留个人。警察、监狱当局和治疗精神病患者的卫生当局都有权在违背当事人意愿的情况下限制当事人。鉴于这些当局几乎完全控制被拘留者的环境,以及被拘留者依赖当局提供日常需要,可以预见,在各种情况下,当局的粗心大意会伤害被拘留者。本章探讨拘留机关过失可能承担的责任。然而,过失并不是被拘留者唯一的侵权行为,甚至不是最重要的侵权行为。他们还可以要求拘留当局对攻击和殴打、公职人员渎职和非法监禁等侵权行为负责,以及对违反《欧洲人权公约》的各种索赔负责。正如本章所解释的那样,过失侵权行为通常作为一种剩余救济,当被拘留者无法获得这些其他救济之一时。本章考虑的另一种过失责任发生在被拘留人自己造成损害的情况下。考虑到一些被拘留的人可能是危险的,可以预见的是,如果他们被错误地释放或允许逃跑,他们将造成伤害。本章探讨在这种情况下被拘留者受伤的人是否可以要求拘留当局承担过失责任。第7章审议了受害者就违反《欧洲人权公约》提出的索赔获得成功的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信