Efficient Allocation of Agent Groups for Complex Tasks in Real Cost Environments

Efrat Manisterski, Esther David, Sarit Kraus, N. Jennings
{"title":"Efficient Allocation of Agent Groups for Complex Tasks in Real Cost Environments","authors":"Efrat Manisterski, Esther David, Sarit Kraus, N. Jennings","doi":"10.1109/SWSTE.2012.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we analyze and propose solutions for complex task allocation problems that have predetermined and known overall payments for any given task. Here a particular task is considered to be complete if all its relevant subtasks are assigned to agents with the necessary capabilities, and the total costs of all the agents falls within a preset limit. In previous work we prove that the problem is NP-hard and that for the general case of the non-cooperative setting, no protocol achieving the efficient solution can exist that is individually rational and budget balanced. Moreover, we show that although efficient protocols may exist in some settings, these will inevitably besetting-specific. Therefore, in this paper we analyze more specific, but nevertheless important, settings for which we develop protocols with the following main advantages. First, we prove these protocols to be individually rational, budget balanced and in equilibrium. Second, the performance of the protocols are evaluated via extensive experiments that show that they outperform previous solutions in this area in terms of efficiency and stability. Third, these protocols are proved to be polynomial in the number of subtasks and agents. Finally, as all proposed protocols are strategy proof or Bayesian Nash incentive compatible, the equilibrium agents' strategies are simply to declare their real costs and capabilities.","PeriodicalId":190562,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE International Conference on Software Science, Technology and Engineering","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE International Conference on Software Science, Technology and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SWSTE.2012.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we analyze and propose solutions for complex task allocation problems that have predetermined and known overall payments for any given task. Here a particular task is considered to be complete if all its relevant subtasks are assigned to agents with the necessary capabilities, and the total costs of all the agents falls within a preset limit. In previous work we prove that the problem is NP-hard and that for the general case of the non-cooperative setting, no protocol achieving the efficient solution can exist that is individually rational and budget balanced. Moreover, we show that although efficient protocols may exist in some settings, these will inevitably besetting-specific. Therefore, in this paper we analyze more specific, but nevertheless important, settings for which we develop protocols with the following main advantages. First, we prove these protocols to be individually rational, budget balanced and in equilibrium. Second, the performance of the protocols are evaluated via extensive experiments that show that they outperform previous solutions in this area in terms of efficiency and stability. Third, these protocols are proved to be polynomial in the number of subtasks and agents. Finally, as all proposed protocols are strategy proof or Bayesian Nash incentive compatible, the equilibrium agents' strategies are simply to declare their real costs and capabilities.
真实成本环境下复杂任务Agent组的有效分配
在本文中,我们分析并提出了复杂任务分配问题的解决方案,这些问题对任何给定的任务都有预定和已知的总支付。在这里,如果将特定任务的所有相关子任务分配给具有必要功能的代理,并且所有代理的总成本落在预设的限制内,则认为该任务已经完成。在之前的工作中,我们证明了该问题是np困难的,并且对于非合作设置的一般情况,不存在个体理性且预算平衡的有效解。此外,我们表明,尽管在某些情况下可能存在有效的协议,但这些协议将不可避免地受到特定环境的困扰。因此,在本文中,我们分析了更具体但仍然重要的设置,我们为此开发了具有以下主要优势的协议。首先,我们证明了这些协议是个体理性的、预算平衡的和均衡的。其次,通过广泛的实验来评估协议的性能,这些实验表明它们在效率和稳定性方面优于该领域以前的解决方案。第三,证明了这些协议在子任务和代理的数量上是多项式的。最后,由于所有提议的协议都是策略证明或贝叶斯纳什激励相容的,均衡代理的策略只是简单地声明他们的实际成本和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信