Physical Fitness of Elementary School Students: Which is better, Circuit Training A and Circuit Training B?

Alifia Ramadhina Putri, Dimas Duta Putra Utama
{"title":"Physical Fitness of Elementary School Students: Which is better, Circuit Training A and Circuit Training B?","authors":"Alifia Ramadhina Putri, Dimas Duta Putra Utama","doi":"10.33503/jp.jok.v5i1.1379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem in this study is that the level of students' physical fitness is still relatively low, so it is necessary to have an optimal exercise program for physical fitness. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of fitness after doing Circuit A and Circuit B. The method used was a quasi-experimental method with a Nonequivalent Control Group Design research design. Where in this design there are two groups, namely one experimental group and one control group, and 60 students were divided into two parts and sampled for the experimental group using ordinal pairing technique. The instrument used is TKJI for ages 10-12 years. The results of this study: 1) Circuit A, r arithmetic 0.908 > r table 0.3610 with = 0.05, N = 30 there is a significant effect. 2) Circuit B, r count 0.8903> r table 0.3610 with = 0.05, N= 30 there is a significant effect. 3) Different test with t count 2.08 > t table 1.671 = 0.05, N = 60 there is a difference. So circuit training A is better in improving students' physical fitness. So that in this research it is hoped that in the future it can be used as a reference for the circuit training A training program as a reference for physical fitness training at the elementary school level.","PeriodicalId":429971,"journal":{"name":"JP.JOK (Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga dan Kesehatan)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JP.JOK (Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga dan Kesehatan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33503/jp.jok.v5i1.1379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The problem in this study is that the level of students' physical fitness is still relatively low, so it is necessary to have an optimal exercise program for physical fitness. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of fitness after doing Circuit A and Circuit B. The method used was a quasi-experimental method with a Nonequivalent Control Group Design research design. Where in this design there are two groups, namely one experimental group and one control group, and 60 students were divided into two parts and sampled for the experimental group using ordinal pairing technique. The instrument used is TKJI for ages 10-12 years. The results of this study: 1) Circuit A, r arithmetic 0.908 > r table 0.3610 with = 0.05, N = 30 there is a significant effect. 2) Circuit B, r count 0.8903> r table 0.3610 with = 0.05, N= 30 there is a significant effect. 3) Different test with t count 2.08 > t table 1.671 = 0.05, N = 60 there is a difference. So circuit training A is better in improving students' physical fitness. So that in this research it is hoped that in the future it can be used as a reference for the circuit training A training program as a reference for physical fitness training at the elementary school level.
小学生身体素质:循环训练A和循环训练B哪个更好?
本研究存在的问题是学生的身体素质水平还比较低,所以需要有一个最优的身体素质锻炼方案。本研究的目的是测定做了A、b两个回路后的体能水平,方法为准实验方法,采用非等效控制组设计研究设计。其中,本设计分为实验组和对照组两组,将60名学生分为两组,采用顺序配对的方法抽取实验组的样本。使用的乐器为TKJI,适用于10-12岁。本研究的结果是:1)电路A, r算法0.908 > r表0.3610 with = 0.05, N = 30有显著影响。2)电路B, r计数0.8903> r表0.3610与= 0.05,N= 30有显著影响。3)不同检验与t计数2.08 >表1.671 = 0.05,N = 60有差异。所以循环训练A在提高学生体质方面效果更好。因此,在本研究中,希望将来可以作为回路训练a训练方案的参考,作为小学阶段体能训练的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信