Capacity-efficient protection with fast recovery in optically transparent mesh networks

Sun-il Kim, S. Lumetta
{"title":"Capacity-efficient protection with fast recovery in optically transparent mesh networks","authors":"Sun-il Kim, S. Lumetta","doi":"10.1109/BROADNETS.2004.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Survivability becomes increasingly critical in managing high-speed networks as data traffic continues to grow in both size and importance. In addition, the impact of failures is exacerbated by the higher data rates available in optical networks. It is therefore imperative to address network survivability in an efficient manner in order to design and operate reliable networks. Transparent optical networks (TONs) provide several advantages over optically opaque networks for supporting the growing communication demands, but suffer from several drawbacks that reduce the efficacy of most applicable capacity-efficient survivability techniques. In this paper, we introduce a novel protection algorithm (for single link and node failures) called streams. The streams algorithm is similar to 1:1 dedicated path protection in terms of implementation and operation overhead, and has identical recovery speeds while requiring less capacity. We compare the streams algorithm with dedicated and shared path protection in terms of capacity requirements, path lengths, and recovery time. We also extend the flooding based mesh restoration algorithm (FBMR) in order to provide a fair comparison in online routing scenarios, and report the relative tradeoffs between the different algorithms. Our results show that dynamically routed streams offer attractive tradeoffs in terms of capacity, path length, recovery speed, data loss and implementation complexity.","PeriodicalId":305639,"journal":{"name":"First International Conference on Broadband Networks","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Conference on Broadband Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BROADNETS.2004.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Survivability becomes increasingly critical in managing high-speed networks as data traffic continues to grow in both size and importance. In addition, the impact of failures is exacerbated by the higher data rates available in optical networks. It is therefore imperative to address network survivability in an efficient manner in order to design and operate reliable networks. Transparent optical networks (TONs) provide several advantages over optically opaque networks for supporting the growing communication demands, but suffer from several drawbacks that reduce the efficacy of most applicable capacity-efficient survivability techniques. In this paper, we introduce a novel protection algorithm (for single link and node failures) called streams. The streams algorithm is similar to 1:1 dedicated path protection in terms of implementation and operation overhead, and has identical recovery speeds while requiring less capacity. We compare the streams algorithm with dedicated and shared path protection in terms of capacity requirements, path lengths, and recovery time. We also extend the flooding based mesh restoration algorithm (FBMR) in order to provide a fair comparison in online routing scenarios, and report the relative tradeoffs between the different algorithms. Our results show that dynamically routed streams offer attractive tradeoffs in terms of capacity, path length, recovery speed, data loss and implementation complexity.
光透明网状网络中具有快速恢复能力的高效保护
随着数据流量的规模和重要性不断增长,生存能力在管理高速网络中变得越来越重要。此外,光纤网络中可用的更高数据速率加剧了故障的影响。因此,为了设计和运行可靠的网络,必须以有效的方式解决网络的生存能力问题。在支持日益增长的通信需求方面,透明光网络(TONs)比不透明光网络具有许多优点,但也存在一些缺点,这些缺点降低了大多数适用的容量效率生存能力技术的有效性。在本文中,我们介绍了一种新的保护算法(单链路和节点故障)称为流。流算法在实现和操作开销方面与1:1专用路径保护相似,恢复速度相同,但需要的容量更少。我们在容量需求、路径长度和恢复时间方面比较了专用和共享路径保护的流算法。我们还扩展了基于泛洪的网格恢复算法(FBMR),以便在在线路由场景中提供公平的比较,并报告了不同算法之间的相对权衡。我们的结果表明,动态路由流在容量、路径长度、恢复速度、数据丢失和实现复杂性方面提供了有吸引力的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信