On the Use of Multifactor Models to Evaluate Mutual Fund Performance

Marno Verbeek, J. Huij
{"title":"On the Use of Multifactor Models to Evaluate Mutual Fund Performance","authors":"Marno Verbeek, J. Huij","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.906723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"We show that multifactor performance estimates for mutual funds suffer from systematic biases and argue that these biases are a result of miscalculating the factor premiums. Because the factor proxies are based on hypothetical stock portfolios and do not incorporate transaction costs, trade impact, and trading restrictions, the factor premiums are either over- or underestimated. We argue that factor proxies based on mutual fund returns rather than on stock returns provide better benchmarks to evaluate professional money managers.\" Copyright (c) 2009 Financial Management Association International..","PeriodicalId":308975,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings (Archive)","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.906723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

"We show that multifactor performance estimates for mutual funds suffer from systematic biases and argue that these biases are a result of miscalculating the factor premiums. Because the factor proxies are based on hypothetical stock portfolios and do not incorporate transaction costs, trade impact, and trading restrictions, the factor premiums are either over- or underestimated. We argue that factor proxies based on mutual fund returns rather than on stock returns provide better benchmarks to evaluate professional money managers." Copyright (c) 2009 Financial Management Association International..
用多因素模型评价共同基金绩效
“我们表明,对共同基金的多因素业绩估计存在系统性偏差,并认为这些偏差是错误计算因素溢价的结果。由于因子代理是基于假设的股票投资组合,不包括交易成本、交易影响和交易限制,因此因子溢价要么被高估,要么被低估。我们认为,基于共同基金回报而非股票回报的因子代理为评估专业基金经理提供了更好的基准。”版权所有(c) 2009国际财务管理协会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信