A Study on the Effectiveness of Automated Essay Marking in the Context of a Blended Learning Course Design

Wenhua Yu, T. Barker
{"title":"A Study on the Effectiveness of Automated Essay Marking in the Context of a Blended Learning Course Design","authors":"Wenhua Yu, T. Barker","doi":"10.22158/elsr.v1n1p20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports on a study undertaken in a Chinese university in order to investigate the effectiveness of an online automated essay marking system in the context of a Blended Learning course design. Two groups of undergraduate learners studying English were required to write essays as part of their normal course. One group had their essays marked by an online automated essay marking and feedback system, the second, control group were marked by a tutor who provided feedback in the normal way. Their essay scores and attitudes to the essay writing tasks were compared. It was found that learners were not disadvantaged by the automated essay marking system. Their mean performance was better (p<0.01) than the tutor marked control for seven of the essays and showed no difference for three essays. In no case did the tutor marked essay group score higher than the automated system. Correlations were performed that indicated that for both groups there was a significant improvement in performance (p<0.05) over the duration of the course and that there was a significant relationship between essay scores for the groups (p<0.01). An investigation of attitude to the automated system as compared to the tutor marked system was more complex. It was found that there was a significant difference in the attitudes of those classified as low and high performers (p<0.05). In the discussion these findings are placed in a Blended Learning context.","PeriodicalId":440676,"journal":{"name":"Education, Language and Sociology Research","volume":"654 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education, Language and Sociology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/elsr.v1n1p20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper reports on a study undertaken in a Chinese university in order to investigate the effectiveness of an online automated essay marking system in the context of a Blended Learning course design. Two groups of undergraduate learners studying English were required to write essays as part of their normal course. One group had their essays marked by an online automated essay marking and feedback system, the second, control group were marked by a tutor who provided feedback in the normal way. Their essay scores and attitudes to the essay writing tasks were compared. It was found that learners were not disadvantaged by the automated essay marking system. Their mean performance was better (p<0.01) than the tutor marked control for seven of the essays and showed no difference for three essays. In no case did the tutor marked essay group score higher than the automated system. Correlations were performed that indicated that for both groups there was a significant improvement in performance (p<0.05) over the duration of the course and that there was a significant relationship between essay scores for the groups (p<0.01). An investigation of attitude to the automated system as compared to the tutor marked system was more complex. It was found that there was a significant difference in the attitudes of those classified as low and high performers (p<0.05). In the discussion these findings are placed in a Blended Learning context.
混合式学习课程设计中论文自动阅卷的有效性研究
本文报告了一项在中国大学进行的研究,目的是调查在线自动论文阅卷系统在混合式学习课程设计背景下的有效性。两组学习英语的大学生被要求写论文,这是他们正常课程的一部分。其中一组的作文由在线自动阅卷和反馈系统打分,另一组则由导师打分,导师以正常方式提供反馈。他们的论文分数和对论文写作任务的态度进行了比较。研究发现,学习者并没有受到自动论文阅卷系统的不利影响。其中7篇论文的平均成绩优于导师标记对照组(p<0.01), 3篇论文的平均成绩无显著差异。在任何情况下,导师给作文组的分数都没有高于自动系统。相关分析表明,两组学生在课程期间的表现都有显著提高(p<0.05),两组学生的作文成绩也有显著相关(p<0.01)。与导师批改系统相比,对自动化系统的态度调查更为复杂。结果发现,低绩效和高绩效学生的态度差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在讨论中,这些发现被置于混合式学习的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信