Regulatory Exclusivity Revision: Working to Achieve Greater Innovation in Approved New Molecular Entities

William Rich
{"title":"Regulatory Exclusivity Revision: Working to Achieve Greater Innovation in Approved New Molecular Entities","authors":"William Rich","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3218034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Rewarding innovation is a part of the regulatory system for drugs, both in terms of patent protection and the granting of regulatory exclusivity. One particular area where there has been a significant amount of innovation is in the development of orphan drugs. However, there has been a persistent issue regarding the significant percentage of approved new drugs that are less innovative than their counterparts. Further, it appears that the level of innovation in approved drugs containing a new molecular entity (NME) has been on the decline. This issue is highlighted by the proliferation of \"me-too\" or \"addition-to-class\" drugs. Me-too or addition-to-class drugs include drugs such as Lipitor and Nexium. These are considered less ground-breaking than other NMEs, as they generally function similarly to products that are already on the market. To combat the proliferation of me-too drugs, this Note proposes increasing regulatory exclusivity as a way to incentivize drug companies to create more innovative NMEs. This Note suggests that increasing exclusivity periods for more innovative NMEs, in that they are a drug with an NME that either demonstrates a new way to treat a disease or is designated for priority review by the FDA, will result in a greater number of these drugs being produced.","PeriodicalId":410798,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Legal Studies eJournal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Legal Studies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3218034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Rewarding innovation is a part of the regulatory system for drugs, both in terms of patent protection and the granting of regulatory exclusivity. One particular area where there has been a significant amount of innovation is in the development of orphan drugs. However, there has been a persistent issue regarding the significant percentage of approved new drugs that are less innovative than their counterparts. Further, it appears that the level of innovation in approved drugs containing a new molecular entity (NME) has been on the decline. This issue is highlighted by the proliferation of "me-too" or "addition-to-class" drugs. Me-too or addition-to-class drugs include drugs such as Lipitor and Nexium. These are considered less ground-breaking than other NMEs, as they generally function similarly to products that are already on the market. To combat the proliferation of me-too drugs, this Note proposes increasing regulatory exclusivity as a way to incentivize drug companies to create more innovative NMEs. This Note suggests that increasing exclusivity periods for more innovative NMEs, in that they are a drug with an NME that either demonstrates a new way to treat a disease or is designated for priority review by the FDA, will result in a greater number of these drugs being produced.
监管排他性修订:努力在已批准的新分子实体中实现更大的创新
奖励创新是药品监管制度的一部分,无论是在专利保护方面还是在授予监管专有权方面。在孤儿药的开发方面,有一个特别的领域已经有了大量的创新。然而,有一个长期存在的问题是,批准的新药中有很大一部分缺乏创新。此外,含有新分子实体(NME)的获批药物的创新水平似乎一直在下降。这一问题因“模仿”或“额外”毒品的泛滥而更加突出。仿制药或附加药物包括立普妥和耐信等药物。与其他NMEs相比,它们被认为不那么具有开创性,因为它们的功能通常与市场上已有的产品相似。为了打击仿制药的泛滥,本说明建议增加监管排他性,以此激励制药公司创造更多创新的非仿制药。本说明建议,增加更具创新性NME的专有权期,因为这些药物的NME要么展示了一种治疗疾病的新方法,要么被FDA指定为优先审查的药物,将导致这些药物的生产数量增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信