Correlation between 6-min walk test and cardiopulmonary exercise test in Chinese patients

P. Wong, E. Chan, D. Ng, K. Kwok, Ada Yip, Shuk-yu Leung
{"title":"Correlation between 6-min walk test and cardiopulmonary exercise test in Chinese patients","authors":"P. Wong, E. Chan, D. Ng, K. Kwok, Ada Yip, Shuk-yu Leung","doi":"10.4103/PRCM.PRCM_24_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in Chinese pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken for Chinese patients with exercise intolerance who had undergone both 6MWT and CPET on the same day over 21 months. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and the maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max). The 6MWD was defined as abnormal if <10th percentile of height-matched reference, and the VO2 maxwas defined as abnormal if <80% predicted. Results: Twenty-nine patients with a mean age of 14.3 ± 3.6 years were included in the study. The correlation coefficient (r) between the 6MWD and the VO2 maxwas 0.457 with P = 0.013. Twenty-six (three excluded as no reference for VO2 maxwas available for age <10 years) patients were analyzed. Using CPET as the gold standard for functional exercise capacity, 6MWT had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 92%, negative predictive value of 29%, sensitivity of 52%, specificity of 80%, and accuracy of 58% for assessing exercise capacity. Conclusion: 6MWT had a high PPV for abnormal CPET. It could still be used as a simple tool to evaluate patients with exercise intolerance.","PeriodicalId":273845,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Respirology and Critical Care Medicine","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Respirology and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/PRCM.PRCM_24_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in Chinese pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken for Chinese patients with exercise intolerance who had undergone both 6MWT and CPET on the same day over 21 months. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and the maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max). The 6MWD was defined as abnormal if <10th percentile of height-matched reference, and the VO2 maxwas defined as abnormal if <80% predicted. Results: Twenty-nine patients with a mean age of 14.3 ± 3.6 years were included in the study. The correlation coefficient (r) between the 6MWD and the VO2 maxwas 0.457 with P = 0.013. Twenty-six (three excluded as no reference for VO2 maxwas available for age <10 years) patients were analyzed. Using CPET as the gold standard for functional exercise capacity, 6MWT had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 92%, negative predictive value of 29%, sensitivity of 52%, specificity of 80%, and accuracy of 58% for assessing exercise capacity. Conclusion: 6MWT had a high PPV for abnormal CPET. It could still be used as a simple tool to evaluate patients with exercise intolerance.
中国患者6分钟步行试验与心肺运动试验的相关性研究
目的:本研究的目的是评估中国儿科患者6分钟步行试验(6MWT)与心肺运动试验(CPET)的相关性。方法:回顾性分析21个月内同时接受6MWT和CPET治疗的中国运动不耐受患者。采用Pearson相关分析检验6 min步行距离(6MWD)与最大摄氧量(VO2 max)之间的相关性。6MWD <高度匹配参考值的10%定义为异常,VO2 max <预测值的80%定义为异常。结果:29例患者入组,平均年龄14.3±3.6岁。6MWD与VO2 max的相关系数r为0.457,P = 0.013。分析了26例患者(其中3例因年龄<10岁无VO2最大值参考而被排除在外)。以CPET作为功能性运动能力的金标准,6MWT评估运动能力的阳性预测值(PPV)为92%,阴性预测值为29%,敏感性为52%,特异性为80%,准确性为58%。结论:6MWT对异常CPET具有较高的PPV。它仍然可以作为一种简单的工具来评估运动不耐受患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信