The impact of diversity on the quality of collective prediction

Van Du Nguyen, N. Nguyen
{"title":"The impact of diversity on the quality of collective prediction","authors":"Van Du Nguyen, N. Nguyen","doi":"10.1109/INISTA.2017.8001148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, there appears to be sufficient evidence that a collective of uninformed individuals can outperform single individuals (even individual experts) in solving some difficult judgment and prediction problems. In some situations, the predictions given by collective members on the outcome of a future event can be modified (such as by updating or removing predictions) to reach a higher consistency level (less diversity) in a collective. The main concern of this paper is to investigate the impact of diversity on the quality of collective prediction by taking into account such modifications within a collective. Diversity is understood as the variety of individual predictions on the same problem. The simulation experiments (with different collective cardinalities and levels of diversity reduction) have revealed that such modifications are not useful in improving the quality of collective prediction. Instead, they have emphasized the important role of diversity in leading to a better collective prediction. That is the more diverse the collective, the better the collective prediction.","PeriodicalId":314687,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)","volume":"6 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2017.8001148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Nowadays, there appears to be sufficient evidence that a collective of uninformed individuals can outperform single individuals (even individual experts) in solving some difficult judgment and prediction problems. In some situations, the predictions given by collective members on the outcome of a future event can be modified (such as by updating or removing predictions) to reach a higher consistency level (less diversity) in a collective. The main concern of this paper is to investigate the impact of diversity on the quality of collective prediction by taking into account such modifications within a collective. Diversity is understood as the variety of individual predictions on the same problem. The simulation experiments (with different collective cardinalities and levels of diversity reduction) have revealed that such modifications are not useful in improving the quality of collective prediction. Instead, they have emphasized the important role of diversity in leading to a better collective prediction. That is the more diverse the collective, the better the collective prediction.
多样性对集体预测质量的影响
如今,似乎有足够的证据表明,在解决一些困难的判断和预测问题时,一群不知情的人可以比单个人(甚至是个别专家)表现得更好。在某些情况下,可以修改集体成员对未来事件结果的预测(例如通过更新或删除预测),以在集体中达到更高的一致性级别(更少的多样性)。本文主要关注的是通过考虑集体内部的这种修改来研究多样性对集体预测质量的影响。多样性被理解为对同一问题个体预测的多样性。模拟实验(具有不同的集体基数和多样性减少水平)表明,这种修改对提高集体预测的质量没有帮助。相反,他们强调多样性在导致更好的集体预测方面的重要作用。也就是说,群体越多样化,群体的预测就越好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信