13. Exclusion Clauses

Ewan Mckendrick
{"title":"13. Exclusion Clauses","authors":"Ewan Mckendrick","doi":"10.1093/HE/9780198701989.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses one particular type of boilerplate clause, namely the exclusion or limitation clause. The chapter examines the role and function of exclusion and limitation clauses in modern commercial contracts. In order to perform its function an exclusion or limitation clause must (i) be validly incorporated into the contract, (ii) cover the loss that has been suffered, and (iii) survive scrutiny under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. Difficult interpretative issues can arise where one party seeks to exclude liability in respect of its own negligence or exclude liability for fundamental breach. The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 applies a reasonableness test to a number of exclusion or limitation clauses. The 1977 Act is also examined, with particular reference to the types of clause that fall within its scope.","PeriodicalId":207231,"journal":{"name":"Contract Law","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contract Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HE/9780198701989.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses one particular type of boilerplate clause, namely the exclusion or limitation clause. The chapter examines the role and function of exclusion and limitation clauses in modern commercial contracts. In order to perform its function an exclusion or limitation clause must (i) be validly incorporated into the contract, (ii) cover the loss that has been suffered, and (iii) survive scrutiny under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. Difficult interpretative issues can arise where one party seeks to exclude liability in respect of its own negligence or exclude liability for fundamental breach. The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 applies a reasonableness test to a number of exclusion or limitation clauses. The 1977 Act is also examined, with particular reference to the types of clause that fall within its scope.
13. 排除条款
本章讨论一种特殊类型的样板条款,即排除或限制条款。本章考察了排除条款和限制条款在现代商事合同中的作用和功能。为了履行其职能,排除或限制条款必须(i)有效地纳入合同,(ii)弥补遭受的损失,以及(iii)在1977年《不公平合同条款法》的审查下有效。当一方试图排除对其自身过失的责任或排除对根本违约的责任时,可能会出现难以解释的问题。1977年《不公平合同条款法》对一些排除或限制条款适用合理性检验。还审查了1977年的《法令》,特别涉及属于其范围的条款类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信