Wealthiest Households’ Handwashing Places Lack Soap in Bangladesh: An Observed, Cross-Sectional Data Analysis

M. Ahamad, M. Burbach, A. N. Islam, Fahian Tanin
{"title":"Wealthiest Households’ Handwashing Places Lack Soap in Bangladesh: An Observed, Cross-Sectional Data Analysis","authors":"M. Ahamad, M. Burbach, A. N. Islam, Fahian Tanin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3497300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A large percentage of the wealthiest households in Bangladesh lack soap at their handwashing places, which is typically considered a problem of the poor. We sought to investigate toilet-sharing and water source along with sociodemographic characteristics as factors associated with the handwashing places missing soap in the wealthiest households of Bangladesh. \n \nMethods: Data for the study came from the 2014 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) of 17300 nationally representative households. One thousand seven hundred fifty-seven (10.2%) of the households categorized in the ninth wealth decile reporting on handwashing places with or without soap were used for analysis. We used both exploratory and logistic regression analyses accounting for survey design and adjusted for sex, age, place of residence, and region to investigate how selected factors were associated with observed handwashing places without soap. \n \nFindings: We found that 40.7% (95% CI: 0.36–0.46) of the wealthiest households were observed to have no soap in their handwashing places. Of these households, those who shared their toilets with another household were 6.4 times (95% CI: 4.41–9.16; p < 0.001) more likely to have handwashing places without soap as compared with those who did not share their toilets. If they shared their toilet with more than nine households, they were 10.1 times (95% CI: 4.65–21.82; p < 0.001) more likely to have handwashing places without soap than those who did not share their toilets. Also, the wealthiest households were 4 times (95% CI: 2.22–7.25; p < 0.001) more likely to have handwashing places without soap if they collected water from their own yard, and 4.7 times (95% CI: 2.38–9.35; p < 0.001) more likely to have handwashing placed with soap if they collected water from other dwellings in comparison to the reference group that collected water from their own dwelling. Water-fetching time was not statistically significant in our analysis. \n \nInterpretation: Bangladesh has the largest number of households having handwashing places without soap in South Asian countries. Factors like toilet-sharing and water source location along with sociodemographic characteristics can explain this “no soap” observation. Cross-examined and self-reported data along with observed data on handwashing and sanitation practice–related questions are essential to understand a household’s actual soap-keeping and usage. Our study demonstrates how data from household-specific health programs can be used to inform all-inclusive hygiene initiatives coupled with sanitation policies to improve public health.","PeriodicalId":137980,"journal":{"name":"Public Health eJournal","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3497300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A large percentage of the wealthiest households in Bangladesh lack soap at their handwashing places, which is typically considered a problem of the poor. We sought to investigate toilet-sharing and water source along with sociodemographic characteristics as factors associated with the handwashing places missing soap in the wealthiest households of Bangladesh. Methods: Data for the study came from the 2014 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) of 17300 nationally representative households. One thousand seven hundred fifty-seven (10.2%) of the households categorized in the ninth wealth decile reporting on handwashing places with or without soap were used for analysis. We used both exploratory and logistic regression analyses accounting for survey design and adjusted for sex, age, place of residence, and region to investigate how selected factors were associated with observed handwashing places without soap. Findings: We found that 40.7% (95% CI: 0.36–0.46) of the wealthiest households were observed to have no soap in their handwashing places. Of these households, those who shared their toilets with another household were 6.4 times (95% CI: 4.41–9.16; p < 0.001) more likely to have handwashing places without soap as compared with those who did not share their toilets. If they shared their toilet with more than nine households, they were 10.1 times (95% CI: 4.65–21.82; p < 0.001) more likely to have handwashing places without soap than those who did not share their toilets. Also, the wealthiest households were 4 times (95% CI: 2.22–7.25; p < 0.001) more likely to have handwashing places without soap if they collected water from their own yard, and 4.7 times (95% CI: 2.38–9.35; p < 0.001) more likely to have handwashing placed with soap if they collected water from other dwellings in comparison to the reference group that collected water from their own dwelling. Water-fetching time was not statistically significant in our analysis. Interpretation: Bangladesh has the largest number of households having handwashing places without soap in South Asian countries. Factors like toilet-sharing and water source location along with sociodemographic characteristics can explain this “no soap” observation. Cross-examined and self-reported data along with observed data on handwashing and sanitation practice–related questions are essential to understand a household’s actual soap-keeping and usage. Our study demonstrates how data from household-specific health programs can be used to inform all-inclusive hygiene initiatives coupled with sanitation policies to improve public health.
孟加拉国最富裕家庭的洗手场所缺乏肥皂:一项观察到的横断面数据分析
背景:在孟加拉国,很大一部分最富有的家庭在洗手的地方没有肥皂,这通常被认为是穷人的问题。我们试图调查在孟加拉国最富裕的家庭中,共用厕所和水源以及社会人口特征是与洗手场所缺少肥皂相关的因素。方法:研究数据来自2014年孟加拉国人口与健康调查(BDHS)的17300个全国代表性家庭。在属于财富十分之一的家庭中,有一千七百五十七户(10.2%)报告了使用或不使用肥皂洗手的地方。我们采用了探索性和逻辑回归分析,考虑了调查设计,并对性别、年龄、居住地和地区进行了调整,以调查所选因素与观察到的无肥皂洗手地点之间的关系。研究结果:我们发现40.7% (95% CI: 0.36-0.46)的最富裕家庭的洗手处没有肥皂。在这些家庭中,与另一个家庭共用厕所的次数为6.4次(95%置信区间:4.41-9.16;P < 0.001)与那些不共用厕所的人相比,更有可能使用没有肥皂的洗手场所。如果他们与9个以上的家庭共用厕所,则为10.1倍(95%置信区间:4.65-21.82;P < 0.001),没有肥皂的洗手场所比那些不共用厕所的人更有可能。此外,最富有的家庭是(95% CI: 2.22-7.25;p < 0.001)如果他们从自己的院子里取水,那么他们更有可能在没有肥皂的洗手场所洗手,是4.7倍(95% CI: 2.38-9.35;P < 0.001)如果他们从其他住所取水,与从自己住所取水的参照组相比,他们更有可能用肥皂洗手。取水时间在我们的分析中没有统计学意义。解读:在南亚国家中,孟加拉国拥有无肥皂洗手场所的家庭数量最多。共用厕所、水源位置以及社会人口特征等因素可以解释这种“无肥皂”现象。交叉检验和自我报告的数据,以及观察到的与洗手和卫生习惯有关的问题的数据,对于了解家庭实际的肥皂保存和使用情况至关重要。我们的研究表明,如何利用家庭特定健康项目的数据,为全面的卫生倡议提供信息,并辅以卫生政策,以改善公众健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信