Pakistan’s Genocide in Bengal and Limited War in Balochistan, 1971–1977

Ahsan I. Butt
{"title":"Pakistan’s Genocide in Bengal and Limited War in Balochistan, 1971–1977","authors":"Ahsan I. Butt","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501713941.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines why the Pakistani state was so much more indiscriminate and extreme in its use of violence against Bengali secessionists in 1971 than Baloch secessionists three years later. It reveals that the primary reason for the variation in state strategy was the perceived differential in third-party support. The chapter then details how the Bengali movement was deemed to be operating hand-in-glove with the Indian state, while by contrast, the Baloch only received sanctuary from Afghanistan. This distinction between moderate and high levels of third-party support meant that the Bengali movement was deemed a much more significant threat to Pakistan's external security than the Baloch movement was. The chapter also looks at the decision makers and soldiers on the ground who were more aggressive and violent in East Pakistan than they were in Balochistan. It recounts Bangladesh's hard-won freedom from Pakistan and explores how it resulted in significant political instability.","PeriodicalId":319701,"journal":{"name":"Secession and Security","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secession and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501713941.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines why the Pakistani state was so much more indiscriminate and extreme in its use of violence against Bengali secessionists in 1971 than Baloch secessionists three years later. It reveals that the primary reason for the variation in state strategy was the perceived differential in third-party support. The chapter then details how the Bengali movement was deemed to be operating hand-in-glove with the Indian state, while by contrast, the Baloch only received sanctuary from Afghanistan. This distinction between moderate and high levels of third-party support meant that the Bengali movement was deemed a much more significant threat to Pakistan's external security than the Baloch movement was. The chapter also looks at the decision makers and soldiers on the ground who were more aggressive and violent in East Pakistan than they were in Balochistan. It recounts Bangladesh's hard-won freedom from Pakistan and explores how it resulted in significant political instability.
1971-1977年,巴基斯坦在孟加拉的种族灭绝和俾路支省的有限战争
这一章探讨了为什么巴基斯坦政府在1971年对孟加拉分离主义者使用的暴力比三年后对俾路支分离主义者使用的暴力更加不分青红皂白和极端。结果表明,州策略变化的主要原因是对第三方支持的感知差异。然后,这一章详细描述了孟加拉运动是如何被认为与印度政府密切合作的,而相比之下,俾路支只是从阿富汗得到了庇护。这种中等和高度的第三方支持之间的区别意味着孟加拉运动被认为是对巴基斯坦外部安全的一个比俾路支运动更大的威胁。这一章还考察了决策者和士兵,他们在东巴基斯坦比在俾路支省更具侵略性和暴力倾向。它讲述了孟加拉国从巴基斯坦手中来之不易的自由,并探讨了它是如何导致严重的政治不稳定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信