Bias-correction in DEA efficiency scores using simulated beta samples: an alternative view of bootstrapping in DEA

P. S. Dharmapala
{"title":"Bias-correction in DEA efficiency scores using simulated beta samples: an alternative view of bootstrapping in DEA","authors":"P. S. Dharmapala","doi":"10.1504/IJMOR.2018.10011877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bootstrapping of DEA efficiency scores came into being under the criticism that DEA input/output data may contain random error, and as a result the efficient frontier may be warped by statistical noise. Since the publication of the seminal paper by Simar and Wilson (1998), several researchers have carried out bootstrapping the DEA frontier, re-computing the efficiency scores after correcting the biases and developing confidence intervals for bias-corrected scores. We view bias-correction in DEA efficiency scores from a different perspective by randomising the efficiency scores that follow underlying beta distributions. In a step-by-step process, using the simulated beta samples, we show how to correct the biases of individual scores, construct confidence intervals for the bias-corrected mean scores and derive some statistical results for the estimators used in the process. Finally, we demonstrate this method by applying it to a set of banks.","PeriodicalId":306451,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Math. Oper. Res.","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Math. Oper. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMOR.2018.10011877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Bootstrapping of DEA efficiency scores came into being under the criticism that DEA input/output data may contain random error, and as a result the efficient frontier may be warped by statistical noise. Since the publication of the seminal paper by Simar and Wilson (1998), several researchers have carried out bootstrapping the DEA frontier, re-computing the efficiency scores after correcting the biases and developing confidence intervals for bias-corrected scores. We view bias-correction in DEA efficiency scores from a different perspective by randomising the efficiency scores that follow underlying beta distributions. In a step-by-step process, using the simulated beta samples, we show how to correct the biases of individual scores, construct confidence intervals for the bias-corrected mean scores and derive some statistical results for the estimators used in the process. Finally, we demonstrate this method by applying it to a set of banks.
使用模拟beta样本的DEA效率分数的偏差校正:DEA中自举的另一种观点
DEA效率分数的自举是在DEA输入/输出数据可能包含随机误差,导致效率边界可能被统计噪声扭曲的批评下产生的。自Simar和Wilson(1998)的开创性论文发表以来,一些研究人员进行了DEA前沿的自举,在纠正偏差后重新计算效率分数,并为偏差校正分数制定置信区间。我们通过随机化遵循潜在beta分布的效率得分,从不同的角度看待DEA效率得分的偏差校正。在一个循序渐进的过程中,使用模拟的beta样本,我们展示了如何纠正个人分数的偏差,为偏差校正的平均分数构建置信区间,并为该过程中使用的估计器导出一些统计结果。最后,我们通过将其应用于一组银行来证明该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信