Grouping The Districts in Sumatera Region Based on Economic Development Indicators Using K-Medoids and CLARA Methods

Retsya Lapiza, Syafriandi, N. Amalita, Dina Fitria
{"title":"Grouping The Districts in Sumatera Region Based on Economic Development Indicators Using K-Medoids and CLARA Methods","authors":"Retsya Lapiza, Syafriandi, N. Amalita, Dina Fitria","doi":"10.24036/ujsds/vol1-iss1/13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inequality in economic development is an economic problem that is often felt by developing countries. In Indonesia, one of the regional areas that has not yet experienced equal distribution of economic development is the regencies/cities of the Sumatera Region. This study aims to determine regional groups and compare the results of grouping with the K-Medoids and CLARA methods. The K-Medoids and CLARA methods are non-hierarchical methods that are strong against outliers. While the best selection method is done by comparing the silhouette coefficient. The results obtained in this study using the K-Medoids and CLARA methods with 2 groups being better than forming 3 groups. The K-Medoids method resulted in cluster 1 as many as 59 districts/cities and cluster 2 as many as 95 districts/cities. Meanwhile, the grouping of districts/cities using the CLARA method with 2 groups resulted in cluster 1 as many as 74 districts/cities and cluster 2 as many as 80 districts/cities. From the comparison of the two methods, the silhouette coefficient values using the K-Medoids and CLARA methods are 0.13 and 0.15 respectively. Therefore, the CLARA method with 2 groups gave better cluster results","PeriodicalId":220933,"journal":{"name":"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/ujsds/vol1-iss1/13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inequality in economic development is an economic problem that is often felt by developing countries. In Indonesia, one of the regional areas that has not yet experienced equal distribution of economic development is the regencies/cities of the Sumatera Region. This study aims to determine regional groups and compare the results of grouping with the K-Medoids and CLARA methods. The K-Medoids and CLARA methods are non-hierarchical methods that are strong against outliers. While the best selection method is done by comparing the silhouette coefficient. The results obtained in this study using the K-Medoids and CLARA methods with 2 groups being better than forming 3 groups. The K-Medoids method resulted in cluster 1 as many as 59 districts/cities and cluster 2 as many as 95 districts/cities. Meanwhile, the grouping of districts/cities using the CLARA method with 2 groups resulted in cluster 1 as many as 74 districts/cities and cluster 2 as many as 80 districts/cities. From the comparison of the two methods, the silhouette coefficient values using the K-Medoids and CLARA methods are 0.13 and 0.15 respectively. Therefore, the CLARA method with 2 groups gave better cluster results
基于K-Medoids和CLARA方法的苏门答腊地区经济发展指标分组
经济发展不平等是发展中国家经常感受到的一个经济问题。在印度尼西亚,尚未经历经济发展平等分配的区域之一是苏门答腊地区的各县/城市。本研究旨在确定区域分组,并将分组结果与K-Medoids和CLARA方法进行比较。k - mediids和CLARA方法是非分层方法,对离群值有很强的抵抗能力。而最佳的选择方法是通过比较轮廓系数。本研究采用k - mediids和CLARA方法得到的结果,2组优于3组。k - mediids方法的结果是,第1组多达59个区/市,第2组多达95个区/市。同时,利用CLARA方法将区/市分为2组,结果第1组多达74个区/市,第2组多达80个区/市。从两种方法的比较来看,K-Medoids和CLARA方法的剪影系数值分别为0.13和0.15。因此,2组的CLARA方法聚类效果较好
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信