Effects of match situational variables on possession: The case of England Premier League season 2015/16

Rodrigo Aquino, R. Aquino, J. Manechini, B. Bedo, E. Puggina, J. Garganta
{"title":"Effects of match situational variables on possession: The case of England Premier League season 2015/16","authors":"Rodrigo Aquino, R. Aquino, J. Manechini, B. Bedo, E. Puggina, J. Garganta","doi":"10.1590/S1980-6574201700030015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To identify the effects of match location, quality of opponents and match status on possession during the 2015/16 Season of England Premier League. Methods: Three hundred and eighty matches played by 20 teams were analysed. For each match, two values were recorded, resulting in 760 observations. Results: Teams who played at home (51.77 ± 10.22%) presented higher possession values (EF=moderate) than those who played away (48.21 ± 10.30%). Quality of opponents also had a significant difference, as possession was higher (EF=large) when teams played against weak (52.30 ± 9.77%) than strong opponents (46.48 ± 10.38%). The multivariate analysis revealed no interaction between situational variables and possession (p = 0.76). Despite the teams classified as “best-ranking” (1st to 8th position: 50.60 ± 10.35%) presented greater possession (EF=moderate) than “worst-ranking” (9st to 20th position: 47.59 ± 9.74%), no significant differences were found in the comparisons of match status (winner [50.34 ± 10.48%] x drawer [49.95 ± 10.25%] x loser [49.68 ± 10.48%]). Conclusion: General interpretations should be viewed with caution, since the possession can represent an indicator of success for a team but not for others.","PeriodicalId":267352,"journal":{"name":"Motriz-revista De Educacao Fisica","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motriz-revista De Educacao Fisica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201700030015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Aims: To identify the effects of match location, quality of opponents and match status on possession during the 2015/16 Season of England Premier League. Methods: Three hundred and eighty matches played by 20 teams were analysed. For each match, two values were recorded, resulting in 760 observations. Results: Teams who played at home (51.77 ± 10.22%) presented higher possession values (EF=moderate) than those who played away (48.21 ± 10.30%). Quality of opponents also had a significant difference, as possession was higher (EF=large) when teams played against weak (52.30 ± 9.77%) than strong opponents (46.48 ± 10.38%). The multivariate analysis revealed no interaction between situational variables and possession (p = 0.76). Despite the teams classified as “best-ranking” (1st to 8th position: 50.60 ± 10.35%) presented greater possession (EF=moderate) than “worst-ranking” (9st to 20th position: 47.59 ± 9.74%), no significant differences were found in the comparisons of match status (winner [50.34 ± 10.48%] x drawer [49.95 ± 10.25%] x loser [49.68 ± 10.48%]). Conclusion: General interpretations should be viewed with caution, since the possession can represent an indicator of success for a team but not for others.
比赛情境变量对控球率的影响——以2015/16赛季英超为例
目的:研究2015/16赛季英超比赛场地、对手实力和比赛状态对控球率的影响。方法:对20支球队的380场比赛进行分析。对于每个匹配,记录两个值,产生760个观察值。结果:主场比赛的球队(51.77±10.22%)控球值(EF=中等)高于客场比赛的球队(48.21±10.30%)。对手的素质也存在显著差异,弱对手(52.30±9.77%)的控球率(EF=大)高于强对手(46.48±10.38%)。多变量分析显示情境变量与占有之间无交互作用(p = 0.76)。尽管排名最佳的球队(第1至第8名:50.60±10.35%)的控球率高于排名最差的球队(第9至第20名:47.59±9.74%),但在比赛状态(胜者[50.34±10.48%]x平手[49.95±10.25%]x败者[49.68±10.48%])的比较中没有发现显著差异。结论:一般的解释应该谨慎看待,因为控球可以代表一个团队的成功指标,但不是其他人的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信