مصطلح أصح شيءٍ في الباب في كتب السنن الأربعة وأثر ذلك في عمل الفقهاء

Abed Rabbo Salman Abed Rabbo Abu Sailik
{"title":"مصطلح أصح شيءٍ في الباب في كتب السنن الأربعة وأثر ذلك في عمل الفقهاء","authors":"Abed Rabbo Salman Abed Rabbo Abu Sailik","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v15i0.189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with a terminology of asah al-shay’ fi hadha al-bab (the most correct thing for this section) as described by hadith scholars of four Sunan collections. The study elaborates the possible meaning of this terminology according to the contextual perspective of how it was established and the effect on regulating process of jurists’ rulings. Hence the purpose of this paper first is to determine the meanings of the terminology then takes a protracted encounter with the impact on the ruling of jurists. This qualitative research which focuses on the inductive, descriptive, critical, and analytical approach are used to the hadiths contained of asah al-shay’ terminology as adopted by the jurists. The finding shows the practice of hadith scholars in using this terminology is not to authenticate the hadiths but contrasting the level of veracity among the hadith transmissions and prioritize them although a hadith would not reach authentic level. And the jurists evidently quote the terminology in a manner agreed upon their principles. Noticeably, they applaud hadith scholars’ viewpoint antecedent to their principles with certain justification if there is any dissimilitude.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v15i0.189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article deals with a terminology of asah al-shay’ fi hadha al-bab (the most correct thing for this section) as described by hadith scholars of four Sunan collections. The study elaborates the possible meaning of this terminology according to the contextual perspective of how it was established and the effect on regulating process of jurists’ rulings. Hence the purpose of this paper first is to determine the meanings of the terminology then takes a protracted encounter with the impact on the ruling of jurists. This qualitative research which focuses on the inductive, descriptive, critical, and analytical approach are used to the hadiths contained of asah al-shay’ terminology as adopted by the jurists. The finding shows the practice of hadith scholars in using this terminology is not to authenticate the hadiths but contrasting the level of veracity among the hadith transmissions and prioritize them although a hadith would not reach authentic level. And the jurists evidently quote the terminology in a manner agreed upon their principles. Noticeably, they applaud hadith scholars’ viewpoint antecedent to their principles with certain justification if there is any dissimilitude.
四年级课本中的正确词及其对学者工作的影响
这篇文章处理的术语是asah al-shay ' fi hadha al-bab(最正确的东西),这是四个苏南文集的圣训学者所描述的。本研究从该术语的产生及其对法学家裁决调节过程的影响的语境角度,阐述了该术语的可能含义。因此,本文的目的首先是确定术语的含义,然后与对法学家裁决的影响进行长期的接触。这种专注于归纳、描述、批判和分析方法的定性研究被用于法学家采用的包含asah al-shay术语的圣训。这一发现表明,圣训学者使用这一术语的做法并不是为了证实圣训的真实性,而是对比圣训传播的真实性水平,并对它们进行优先排序,尽管圣训不会达到真实的水平。法学家们显然以他们在原则上达成一致的方式引用这些术语。值得注意的是,他们赞扬圣训学者的观点先于他们的原则,如果有任何不同之处,他们有一定的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信