Security Test Generation by Answer Set Programming

Philipp Zech, M. Felderer, Basel Katt, R. Breu
{"title":"Security Test Generation by Answer Set Programming","authors":"Philipp Zech, M. Felderer, Basel Katt, R. Breu","doi":"10.1109/SERE.2014.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security testing still is a hard task, especially if focusing on non-functional security testing. The two main reasons behind this are, first, at the most a lack of the necessary knowledge required for security testing, second, managing the almost infinite amount of negative test cases, which result from potential security risks. To the best of our knowledge, the issue of the automatic incorporation of security expert knowledge, e.g., known vulnerabilities, exploits and attacks, in the process of security testing is not well considered in the literature. Furthermore, well-known \"de facto\" security testing approaches, like fuzzing or penetration testing, lack systematic procedures regarding the order of execution of test cases, which renders security testing a cumbersome task. Hence, in this paper we propose a new method for generating negative security tests by logic programming, which applies a risk analysis to establish a set of negative requirements for later test generation.","PeriodicalId":248957,"journal":{"name":"2014 Eighth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Eighth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERE.2014.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Security testing still is a hard task, especially if focusing on non-functional security testing. The two main reasons behind this are, first, at the most a lack of the necessary knowledge required for security testing, second, managing the almost infinite amount of negative test cases, which result from potential security risks. To the best of our knowledge, the issue of the automatic incorporation of security expert knowledge, e.g., known vulnerabilities, exploits and attacks, in the process of security testing is not well considered in the literature. Furthermore, well-known "de facto" security testing approaches, like fuzzing or penetration testing, lack systematic procedures regarding the order of execution of test cases, which renders security testing a cumbersome task. Hence, in this paper we propose a new method for generating negative security tests by logic programming, which applies a risk analysis to establish a set of negative requirements for later test generation.
基于答案集编程的安全测试生成
安全性测试仍然是一项艰巨的任务,特别是关注非功能安全性测试时。这背后的两个主要原因是,第一,最多缺乏安全测试所需的必要知识,第二,管理几乎无限数量的负面测试用例,这是由潜在的安全风险造成的。据我们所知,在安全测试过程中自动纳入安全专家知识(例如,已知的漏洞、利用和攻击)的问题在文献中没有得到很好的考虑。此外,众所周知的“事实”安全性测试方法,如模糊测试或渗透测试,缺乏关于测试用例执行顺序的系统过程,这使得安全性测试成为一项繁琐的任务。因此,本文提出了一种通过逻辑编程生成负性安全测试的新方法,该方法利用风险分析来建立一组负性需求,供以后的测试生成使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信