Giving ideas an equal chance: inclusion and representation in participatory design with children

J. Read, Dan Fitton, M. Horton
{"title":"Giving ideas an equal chance: inclusion and representation in participatory design with children","authors":"J. Read, Dan Fitton, M. Horton","doi":"10.1145/2593968.2593986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participatory Design (PD) in various guises is a popular approach with the Interaction Design and Children (IDC) community. In studying it as a method very little work has considered the fundamentals of participation, namely how children choose to participate and how their ideas are included and represented. This paper highlights ethical concerns about PD with children within the context of information needed to consent. In helping children understand participation in PD, a central aspect is the necessity to help children understand how their design ideas are used which itself challenges researchers to seek a fair and equitable process that is describable and defensible. The TRAck (tracking, representing and acknowledging) Method, is described as an initial process that could meet this need. This is evaluated, in two forms, in a PD study with 84 children. The TRAck Method encouraged careful scrutiny of designs and allowed the researchers to distil useful design ideas although these were maybe not the most imaginative. There is a trade off between the limitations of applying such a process to PD against the benefits of ensuring fullinformed involvement of children.","PeriodicalId":260552,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children","volume":"7 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"93","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2593986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 93

Abstract

Participatory Design (PD) in various guises is a popular approach with the Interaction Design and Children (IDC) community. In studying it as a method very little work has considered the fundamentals of participation, namely how children choose to participate and how their ideas are included and represented. This paper highlights ethical concerns about PD with children within the context of information needed to consent. In helping children understand participation in PD, a central aspect is the necessity to help children understand how their design ideas are used which itself challenges researchers to seek a fair and equitable process that is describable and defensible. The TRAck (tracking, representing and acknowledging) Method, is described as an initial process that could meet this need. This is evaluated, in two forms, in a PD study with 84 children. The TRAck Method encouraged careful scrutiny of designs and allowed the researchers to distil useful design ideas although these were maybe not the most imaginative. There is a trade off between the limitations of applying such a process to PD against the benefits of ensuring fullinformed involvement of children.
给创意一个平等的机会:儿童参与设计的包容性和代表性
各种形式的参与式设计(PD)是交互设计和儿童(IDC)社区中流行的一种方法。在将其作为一种方法进行研究时,很少有工作考虑到参与的基本原则,即儿童如何选择参与以及他们的想法如何被纳入和代表。本文强调了在同意所需信息的背景下对儿童PD的伦理关注。在帮助孩子理解PD参与的过程中,一个核心方面是帮助孩子理解他们的设计想法是如何被使用的,这本身就挑战了研究人员寻求一个公平和公平的过程,这个过程是可描述的和可辩护的。TRAck(跟踪、表示和确认)方法被描述为能够满足这一需求的初始过程。在一项84名儿童的PD研究中,以两种形式评估了这一点。TRAck方法鼓励对设计进行仔细审查,并允许研究人员提炼出有用的设计想法,尽管这些想法可能不是最有想象力的。在将这种过程应用于PD的局限性与确保儿童充分参与的好处之间存在权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信