Formation of legislation on pension insurance in France, Great Britain, and Russia. A retrospective

A. Aleksandrova, A. Lapaeva, A. Ryzhova, E. Serebryakova
{"title":"Formation of legislation on pension insurance in France, Great Britain, and Russia. A retrospective","authors":"A. Aleksandrova, A. Lapaeva, A. Ryzhova, E. Serebryakova","doi":"10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study is due to the crisis of modern pension insurance systems and the need to change the paradigm of pension legislation development. The purpose of the study is to identify the features of the formation of legislation on pension insurance in several countries (France, Great Britain, and Russia) at the initial stage of development (before 1914). The novelty is expressed both in the formulation of the problem and in the research methodology (the choice of countries and the period of research, the justification for the use of methods: dialectics, analysis, synthesis, system-structural, sociological, statistical, historical-legal, comparative-legal, formal-legal). The result of the study was the conclusions about the historical conditionality of the peculiarities of the formation of legislation on pension insurance in a particular country. There was early legalization of both voluntary and compulsory pension insurance in France. There was no legislation on pension insurance in the UK during the period under review, despite the early development of relevant institutions in the framework of workshops, guilds, and later in the framework of trade unions and “friendly societies”. In Russia, due to the agrarian nature of the economy, pension insurance did not develop within the framework of workshops and guilds; there were no laws on insurance in case of old age by 1914, while the risks of disability and loss of the breadwinner were regulated by law.","PeriodicalId":298173,"journal":{"name":"JURÍDICAS CUC","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURÍDICAS CUC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the study is due to the crisis of modern pension insurance systems and the need to change the paradigm of pension legislation development. The purpose of the study is to identify the features of the formation of legislation on pension insurance in several countries (France, Great Britain, and Russia) at the initial stage of development (before 1914). The novelty is expressed both in the formulation of the problem and in the research methodology (the choice of countries and the period of research, the justification for the use of methods: dialectics, analysis, synthesis, system-structural, sociological, statistical, historical-legal, comparative-legal, formal-legal). The result of the study was the conclusions about the historical conditionality of the peculiarities of the formation of legislation on pension insurance in a particular country. There was early legalization of both voluntary and compulsory pension insurance in France. There was no legislation on pension insurance in the UK during the period under review, despite the early development of relevant institutions in the framework of workshops, guilds, and later in the framework of trade unions and “friendly societies”. In Russia, due to the agrarian nature of the economy, pension insurance did not develop within the framework of workshops and guilds; there were no laws on insurance in case of old age by 1914, while the risks of disability and loss of the breadwinner were regulated by law.
法国、英国和俄罗斯养老保险立法的形成。回顾
研究的相关性是由于现代养老保险制度的危机和需要改变养老保险立法发展的范式。本研究的目的是确定几个国家(法国、英国和俄罗斯)在发展的初始阶段(1914年以前)养老保险立法形成的特点。新颖性既表现在问题的表述上,也表现在研究方法上(对国家和研究时期的选择,使用辩证法、分析、综合、系统结构、社会学、统计学、历史法、比较法、形式法等方法的理由)。研究的结果是得出关于某一特定国家养恤金保险立法形成的特殊性的历史条件的结论。法国很早就将自愿和强制养老保险合法化。在本报告所述期间,联合王国没有关于养恤金保险的立法,尽管早期在车间、行会框架内以及后来在工会和“友好协会”框架内发展了相关机构。在俄罗斯,由于经济的农业性质,养老保险没有在车间和行会的框架内发展;到1914年,还没有关于老年保险的法律,而残疾和丧失养家者的风险是由法律规定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信