A comparative study of palmprint feature extraction methods for contact-less biometrics under different environmental conditions

Belén Ríos-Sánchez, Miguel Viana-Matesanz, C. S. Ávila
{"title":"A comparative study of palmprint feature extraction methods for contact-less biometrics under different environmental conditions","authors":"Belén Ríos-Sánchez, Miguel Viana-Matesanz, C. S. Ávila","doi":"10.1109/CCST.2017.8167806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interest on palmprint biometrics has experimented a strong growth in the last decades due to its useful characteristics as uniqueness, permanence, reliability, user-friendliness, acceptability, non-intrusiveness, and low cost of the acquisition devices, which make it attractive for civil and commercial applications. Accordingly, a wide research has been developed in this field. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evaluation of the results under a common framework which permits to obtain a fair comparison between different methods. In this work an evaluation methodology based on the definitions suggested by the ISO/IDE 19795 norm is provided and applied to evaluate different palmprint feature extraction methods and matching approaches in terms of accuracy and computation time, offering a basis against which to compare future research. Given the growing trend towards touch-less biometrics promoted by the increase in the use of mobile devices, the evaluation has been carried out using two different contact-less hand databases. First database was recorded under totally controlled environmental conditions and providing the user some feedback about the recorded images during the acquisition process, while second database introduces lighting variations as well as no-pose restrictions during the capture.","PeriodicalId":371622,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","volume":"88 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.2017.8167806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interest on palmprint biometrics has experimented a strong growth in the last decades due to its useful characteristics as uniqueness, permanence, reliability, user-friendliness, acceptability, non-intrusiveness, and low cost of the acquisition devices, which make it attractive for civil and commercial applications. Accordingly, a wide research has been developed in this field. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evaluation of the results under a common framework which permits to obtain a fair comparison between different methods. In this work an evaluation methodology based on the definitions suggested by the ISO/IDE 19795 norm is provided and applied to evaluate different palmprint feature extraction methods and matching approaches in terms of accuracy and computation time, offering a basis against which to compare future research. Given the growing trend towards touch-less biometrics promoted by the increase in the use of mobile devices, the evaluation has been carried out using two different contact-less hand databases. First database was recorded under totally controlled environmental conditions and providing the user some feedback about the recorded images during the acquisition process, while second database introduces lighting variations as well as no-pose restrictions during the capture.
不同环境条件下非接触式生物识别掌纹特征提取方法的比较研究
在过去的几十年里,由于其独特性、持久性、可靠性、用户友好性、可接受性、非侵入性和采集设备的低成本等有用的特征,对掌纹生物识别技术的兴趣已经经历了强劲的增长,这使得它对民用和商业应用具有吸引力。因此,在这一领域展开了广泛的研究。然而,缺乏在一个共同框架下对结果进行评价,从而无法对不同的方法进行公平的比较。本文提出了一种基于ISO/IDE 19795规范定义的评价方法,并将其应用于评价不同掌纹特征提取方法和匹配方法的准确性和计算时间,为比较未来的研究提供了基础。由于移动设备使用的增加,推动了非接触生物识别技术的发展趋势,因此评估使用了两个不同的非接触手部数据库进行。第一个数据库在完全受控的环境条件下进行记录,并在获取过程中为用户提供有关记录图像的一些反馈,而第二个数据库在捕获过程中引入光照变化以及无姿势限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信