Greats: Learning Strategies of Master Forensic Psychiatrists

G. Glancy, Daniel Miller
{"title":"Greats: Learning Strategies of Master Forensic Psychiatrists","authors":"G. Glancy, Daniel Miller","doi":"10.15173/IJRR.V4I1.3911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For forensic psychiatry to thrive as a profession, practitioners need to be committed to intentional, continuous learning and development throughout their careers. However, carving their way through the challenges of practice and finding room to grow can be daunting. Research can help lessen this burden by examining the careers of experienced and skilled practitioners, identifying the factors that influenced their development, and the strategies they used to direct it. To date, little research of this kind has been conducted in forensic psychiatry. In this study, we used the deliberate practice model of elite performance as a heuristic to interpret the accounts of several experienced and distinguished practitioners, revealing and characterizing the influences and activities they identify as having been most important to their development. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with six participants from across North America who started their forensic careers between 1965 and 1980. Transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis. Participants cited little in the way of highly structured activities designed specifically to improve performance. They instead described using opportunities to learn from real casework and additional knowledge pursuits, as well as using deliberate career management to structure the conditions of their work-based learning. They also stressed the effect of entering forensic practice during a period of increasing interest, demand and investment, which yielded early opportunities to learn through practice. We discuss limitations in the deliberate practice model’s capacity to capture key learning strategies in forensic psychiatry, connections between work-based learning and the discipline’s general historical trajectory, and the role of career management in professional development strategies.","PeriodicalId":181328,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Risk and Recovery","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Risk and Recovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15173/IJRR.V4I1.3911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For forensic psychiatry to thrive as a profession, practitioners need to be committed to intentional, continuous learning and development throughout their careers. However, carving their way through the challenges of practice and finding room to grow can be daunting. Research can help lessen this burden by examining the careers of experienced and skilled practitioners, identifying the factors that influenced their development, and the strategies they used to direct it. To date, little research of this kind has been conducted in forensic psychiatry. In this study, we used the deliberate practice model of elite performance as a heuristic to interpret the accounts of several experienced and distinguished practitioners, revealing and characterizing the influences and activities they identify as having been most important to their development. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with six participants from across North America who started their forensic careers between 1965 and 1980. Transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis. Participants cited little in the way of highly structured activities designed specifically to improve performance. They instead described using opportunities to learn from real casework and additional knowledge pursuits, as well as using deliberate career management to structure the conditions of their work-based learning. They also stressed the effect of entering forensic practice during a period of increasing interest, demand and investment, which yielded early opportunities to learn through practice. We discuss limitations in the deliberate practice model’s capacity to capture key learning strategies in forensic psychiatry, connections between work-based learning and the discipline’s general historical trajectory, and the role of career management in professional development strategies.
伟大:法医精神科硕士的学习策略
为了使法医精神病学作为一种职业蓬勃发展,从业者需要在他们的职业生涯中致力于有意识的、持续的学习和发展。然而,在实践的挑战中开辟自己的道路并找到成长的空间可能是令人生畏的。研究可以通过审查有经验和熟练的从业人员的职业生涯,确定影响他们发展的因素以及他们用来指导发展的战略来帮助减轻这一负担。到目前为止,在法医精神病学中进行的这类研究很少。在这项研究中,我们使用精英表现的刻意练习模型作为启发式来解释几位经验丰富和杰出的实践者的叙述,揭示和描述他们认为对他们的发展最重要的影响和活动。研究人员对来自北美各地的六名在1965年至1980年间开始从事法医工作的参与者进行了半结构化的电话采访。使用定向内容分析分析转录本。参与者很少提到专门为提高表现而设计的高度结构化的活动。相反,他们描述了利用机会从真实的案例工作和额外的知识追求中学习,以及利用深思熟虑的职业管理来构建他们基于工作的学习条件。他们还强调了在兴趣、需求和投资不断增加的时期进入法医行业的影响,这为通过实践学习提供了早期机会。我们讨论了刻意练习模型捕捉法医精神病学关键学习策略的能力的局限性,基于工作的学习与该学科总体历史轨迹之间的联系,以及职业管理在专业发展战略中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信