Sovereignty in Rousseau: from Instinctive Freedom to Conscious Freedom

Baltazar Macaíba de Sousa
{"title":"Sovereignty in Rousseau: from Instinctive Freedom to Conscious Freedom","authors":"Baltazar Macaíba de Sousa","doi":"10.30845/aijss.v8n3p10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text is a reading piece about Rousseau’s concept of sovereignty, as a maximal expression of men’s free willing in the civil society, in a direct relation with the instinct of liberty – will – of men in the natural society. Rousseau was deeply worried about inequality among men, since its consequence is freedom and utmost good inhibition. So, in the transition between wild to political stage, man has preserved and changed his particularity as a free Being. One can affirm that Rousseau started a new moment over sovereignty in which people are the collective being of this supreme will. This is to say that Civil State is a being of reason and, only rational Will can create it. The state appears as a real entity, not an abstract one.","PeriodicalId":421989,"journal":{"name":"American International Journal of Social Science","volume":"242 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American International Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/aijss.v8n3p10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The text is a reading piece about Rousseau’s concept of sovereignty, as a maximal expression of men’s free willing in the civil society, in a direct relation with the instinct of liberty – will – of men in the natural society. Rousseau was deeply worried about inequality among men, since its consequence is freedom and utmost good inhibition. So, in the transition between wild to political stage, man has preserved and changed his particularity as a free Being. One can affirm that Rousseau started a new moment over sovereignty in which people are the collective being of this supreme will. This is to say that Civil State is a being of reason and, only rational Will can create it. The state appears as a real entity, not an abstract one.
卢梭的主权:从本能的自由到意识的自由
本文是一篇关于卢梭主权概念的阅读文章,作为公民社会中人的自由意志的最大表达,与自然社会中人的自由意志的本能直接相关。卢梭对人与人之间的不平等深感忧虑,因为它的后果是自由和最大限度的良好抑制。因此,在从野生阶段到政治阶段的过渡中,人保持并改变了他作为自由存在的特殊性。我们可以肯定,卢梭开创了一个关于主权的新时代,在这个时代,人们是这个最高意志的集体存在。这就是说,公民国家是理性的存在,只有理性的意志才能创造它。国家表现为一个真实的实体,而不是抽象的实体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信