Competitive Parity, Status Disparity, and Mutual Forbearance: Securities Analysts' Competition for Investor Attention

Anne Bowers, H. Greve, H. Mitsuhashi, Joel A. C. Baum
{"title":"Competitive Parity, Status Disparity, and Mutual Forbearance: Securities Analysts' Competition for Investor Attention","authors":"Anne Bowers, H. Greve, H. Mitsuhashi, Joel A. C. Baum","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2241497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most studies of responses to change in competitive environments focus on competitor-specific adaptations. However, rivals are often acutely aware of one another, and this awareness should influence their competitive behavior. In this study, we focus on three market structures that affect competitive behavior: competitive parity, status disparity, and multipoint contact. In particular, we examine how securities analysts responded to a regulatory discontinuity, Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg-FD), which promoted competitive parity by eliminating privileged access to proprietary firm information as a critical source of competitive advantage. We predict and find that Reg-FD activated mutual forbearance among analysts linked through multipoint contact. We also predict and find that high-status analysts forbear more strongly. Analysts’ responses to heterogeneity in competitive advantage thus depend importantly on their competitive overlap and status, with notable implications for their behavior and the information they provide to investors.","PeriodicalId":122208,"journal":{"name":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2241497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

Most studies of responses to change in competitive environments focus on competitor-specific adaptations. However, rivals are often acutely aware of one another, and this awareness should influence their competitive behavior. In this study, we focus on three market structures that affect competitive behavior: competitive parity, status disparity, and multipoint contact. In particular, we examine how securities analysts responded to a regulatory discontinuity, Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg-FD), which promoted competitive parity by eliminating privileged access to proprietary firm information as a critical source of competitive advantage. We predict and find that Reg-FD activated mutual forbearance among analysts linked through multipoint contact. We also predict and find that high-status analysts forbear more strongly. Analysts’ responses to heterogeneity in competitive advantage thus depend importantly on their competitive overlap and status, with notable implications for their behavior and the information they provide to investors.
竞争平价、地位差距与相互包容:证券分析师争夺投资者注意力的竞争
大多数关于对竞争环境变化的反应的研究都集中在竞争对手特定的适应上。然而,竞争对手往往敏锐地意识到对方,这种意识应该影响他们的竞争行为。在本研究中,我们聚焦于三种影响竞争行为的市场结构:竞争平价、地位差异和多点接触。特别是,我们研究了证券分析师如何应对监管不连续,监管公平披露(regg - fd),它通过消除对专有公司信息的特权访问作为竞争优势的关键来源来促进竞争平价。我们预测并发现Reg-FD通过多点接触激活了分析师之间的相互容忍。我们还预测并发现,地位高的分析师的忍耐力更强。因此,分析师对竞争优势异质性的反应在很大程度上取决于他们的竞争重叠和地位,这对他们的行为和他们向投资者提供的信息有显著的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信