A Study of HIV/AIDS Co-Infections and Coping Strategies of Key Population of Nepal

B. B. Subba Phudong, N. Rimal
{"title":"A Study of HIV/AIDS Co-Infections and Coping Strategies of Key Population of Nepal","authors":"B. B. Subba Phudong, N. Rimal","doi":"10.3126/SAARCTB.V16I1.23240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Nepal is considered as a concentrated HIV epidemic among key population like Migrant Labour Worker (MLW), Sex Worker (SW), Injecting Drug User (IDU) and Spouse of Migrant Labour Worker (SMLW). Hence, the HIV infection has significantly contributed to be HIV/TB co-infected among key population. Intervention of Anti Retroviral Therapy (ART) and Direct Observed Short Course (DOTS) have significantly reduced HIV associated morbidity and mortality in Nepal. The objective of this study was to analyze coping strategies to access the HIV/TB services in relation to socio-economic status of key study population. \nMethods: The study was conducted in five districts Jhapa, Morang, Sunsari, Kavre and Parsa of Nepal. The HIV/TB respondents were selected from previous background of key population: MLW, SW, IDU, and SMLW. 343 respondents were selected through snowballing and convenient sampling technique. The data were collected through face to face interview using pretested questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and ANOVA test were applied to analyze the collected data. \nResults: Among 343 HIV/TB co-infected respondents, more than two fifth (44.3%) were belonged to MLW, followed by one third (34.1%) of respondents were SMLW. Therefore, the HIV/TB co-infection was significant association (p=0.001) with employment status and key study population. In addition to this, the study showed that there was significant difference between facing stigma/discrimination and study districts (F=11.03, p=0.001) of respondents. Similarly, there was significant difference between used of previous saving and occupation of family (F=10.461, p=0.001) as coping strategies to access HIV/TB services. \nConclusion: Despite the existing stigma and discrimination, the key study population had used various coping strategies to access the health care services in relation to their socio-economic status.  ","PeriodicalId":175434,"journal":{"name":"SAARC Journal of Tuberculosis, Lung Diseases and HIV/AIDS","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAARC Journal of Tuberculosis, Lung Diseases and HIV/AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/SAARCTB.V16I1.23240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Nepal is considered as a concentrated HIV epidemic among key population like Migrant Labour Worker (MLW), Sex Worker (SW), Injecting Drug User (IDU) and Spouse of Migrant Labour Worker (SMLW). Hence, the HIV infection has significantly contributed to be HIV/TB co-infected among key population. Intervention of Anti Retroviral Therapy (ART) and Direct Observed Short Course (DOTS) have significantly reduced HIV associated morbidity and mortality in Nepal. The objective of this study was to analyze coping strategies to access the HIV/TB services in relation to socio-economic status of key study population. Methods: The study was conducted in five districts Jhapa, Morang, Sunsari, Kavre and Parsa of Nepal. The HIV/TB respondents were selected from previous background of key population: MLW, SW, IDU, and SMLW. 343 respondents were selected through snowballing and convenient sampling technique. The data were collected through face to face interview using pretested questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and ANOVA test were applied to analyze the collected data. Results: Among 343 HIV/TB co-infected respondents, more than two fifth (44.3%) were belonged to MLW, followed by one third (34.1%) of respondents were SMLW. Therefore, the HIV/TB co-infection was significant association (p=0.001) with employment status and key study population. In addition to this, the study showed that there was significant difference between facing stigma/discrimination and study districts (F=11.03, p=0.001) of respondents. Similarly, there was significant difference between used of previous saving and occupation of family (F=10.461, p=0.001) as coping strategies to access HIV/TB services. Conclusion: Despite the existing stigma and discrimination, the key study population had used various coping strategies to access the health care services in relation to their socio-economic status.  
尼泊尔重点人群艾滋病毒/艾滋病合并感染及应对策略研究
简介:尼泊尔被认为是艾滋病毒疫情集中的关键人群,如移徙工人(MLW)、性工作者(SW)、注射吸毒者(IDU)和移徙工人的配偶(SMLW)。因此,艾滋病毒感染是关键人群中艾滋病毒/结核病合并感染的重要因素。抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)干预和直接观察短程化疗(DOTS)显著降低了尼泊尔与艾滋病毒相关的发病率和死亡率。本研究的目的是分析与主要研究人群的社会经济状况有关的获得艾滋病毒/结核病服务的应对策略。方法:在尼泊尔Jhapa、Morang、Sunsari、Kavre和Parsa五个区进行研究。艾滋病毒/结核病应答者是从以前的关键人群背景中选择的:MLW、SW、IDU和SMLW。通过滚雪球法和方便抽样法,抽取了343名调查对象。数据采用预测问卷,采用面对面访谈的方式收集。采用描述性统计、卡方检验和方差分析对收集到的资料进行分析。结果:在343例HIV/TB合并感染的应答者中,超过五分之二(44.3%)的应答者为MLW,其次是三分之一(34.1%)的SMLW。因此,HIV/TB合并感染与就业状况和重点研究人群显著相关(p=0.001)。此外,研究还发现,被调查者所面临的污名/歧视与研究地区之间存在显著差异(F=11.03, p=0.001)。同样,使用以前的储蓄和家庭职业作为获得艾滋病毒/结核病服务的应对策略之间存在显著差异(F=10.461, p=0.001)。结论:尽管存在污名和歧视,但重点研究人群在获得卫生保健服务时采用了与其社会经济地位相关的各种应对策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信