Analysis of Students Errors in Mathematical Reasoning on Geometry by Gender

A. Setiawan, C. Sa’dijah
{"title":"Analysis of Students Errors in Mathematical Reasoning on Geometry by Gender","authors":"A. Setiawan, C. Sa’dijah","doi":"10.2021/JODLI.V1I2.13542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to identify the reasoning male and female in solving geometry problems. Using qualitative descriptive approach, the subjects in this study were 42 male and 42 female students from two schools in the district Mesuji Lampung, Indonesia. The instrument used was a test essay consists of two problems related to geometry. The findings of this study indicate that male students have superior reasoning ability than female students. Another finding that students can make mistakes in every stage of reasoning is based on five indicators of reasoning primarily on third indicator it is perform mathematical manipulations and provide a reason or evidence to the truth of the solution, fourth indicator it is checking the validity of an argument, and fifth indicator it is draw conclusions and the first indicator and the second indicator students make a little mistake.","PeriodicalId":262711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2021/JODLI.V1I2.13542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the reasoning male and female in solving geometry problems. Using qualitative descriptive approach, the subjects in this study were 42 male and 42 female students from two schools in the district Mesuji Lampung, Indonesia. The instrument used was a test essay consists of two problems related to geometry. The findings of this study indicate that male students have superior reasoning ability than female students. Another finding that students can make mistakes in every stage of reasoning is based on five indicators of reasoning primarily on third indicator it is perform mathematical manipulations and provide a reason or evidence to the truth of the solution, fourth indicator it is checking the validity of an argument, and fifth indicator it is draw conclusions and the first indicator and the second indicator students make a little mistake.
学生几何数学推理错误的性别分析
本研究的目的是找出男性和女性在解决几何问题时的推理能力。本研究采用质性描述方法,选取印尼梅苏吉楠榜地区两所学校的42名男学生和42名女学生为研究对象。使用的工具是一篇由两个与几何有关的问题组成的测试文章。本研究结果显示,男学生的推理能力优于女学生。另一个发现是学生在推理的每个阶段都会犯错误,这是基于推理的五个指标,主要是第三个指标,它是执行数学操作,并为解决方案的真实性提供原因或证据,第四个指标是检查论点的有效性,第五个指标是得出结论,第一个指标和第二个指标学生犯一点错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信