Adverse Events in Hospitals: “Swiss Cheese” Versus the “Hierarchal Referral Model of Care and Clinical Futile Cycles”

M. Buist
{"title":"Adverse Events in Hospitals: “Swiss Cheese” Versus the “Hierarchal Referral Model of Care and Clinical Futile Cycles”","authors":"M. Buist","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.75380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The James Reason ‘Swiss Cheese’ model of adverse event causation has been the predom- inant principle in the determination and prevention of health-care-associated adverse events for the last 20 years. This model was developed to understand the causation of large-scale organisational and industrial accidents. In principle, it looks for holes in the defence layers of a large organisation that are largely administrative and not the fault of individuals that may be directly involved with the accident. This model has limitations when applied to health care, where most of the errors or accidents are individual technical or competency deficiencies within a background of an ever-changing micro socio-cultural environment. As such, using ‘Swiss Cheese’ methodology, there has been an over reliance on looking for system issues in health care that has led to a decreased focus on the individual performance of the health-care professional and avoidance of difficult cultural workplace issues. Clinical futile cycles (CFCs) are a model of adverse event causation that primarily focuses on the interaction between the immediate health- care professionals and patients and between health-care professionals. This focus allows for interventions that address issues such as clinical competency and the culture of the health-care environment. later found widespread bowel and hepatic ischaemia, and Mrs. M died the next day of multi-organ failure (Day-6).","PeriodicalId":222529,"journal":{"name":"Vignettes in Patient Safety - Volume 3","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vignettes in Patient Safety - Volume 3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.75380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The James Reason ‘Swiss Cheese’ model of adverse event causation has been the predom- inant principle in the determination and prevention of health-care-associated adverse events for the last 20 years. This model was developed to understand the causation of large-scale organisational and industrial accidents. In principle, it looks for holes in the defence layers of a large organisation that are largely administrative and not the fault of individuals that may be directly involved with the accident. This model has limitations when applied to health care, where most of the errors or accidents are individual technical or competency deficiencies within a background of an ever-changing micro socio-cultural environment. As such, using ‘Swiss Cheese’ methodology, there has been an over reliance on looking for system issues in health care that has led to a decreased focus on the individual performance of the health-care professional and avoidance of difficult cultural workplace issues. Clinical futile cycles (CFCs) are a model of adverse event causation that primarily focuses on the interaction between the immediate health- care professionals and patients and between health-care professionals. This focus allows for interventions that address issues such as clinical competency and the culture of the health-care environment. later found widespread bowel and hepatic ischaemia, and Mrs. M died the next day of multi-organ failure (Day-6).
医院不良事件:“瑞士奶酪”与“分级转诊模式与临床无效循环”
在过去的20年里,不良事件因果关系的詹姆斯原因“瑞士奶酪”模型一直是确定和预防卫生保健相关不良事件的主要原则。该模型是为了理解大规模组织和工业事故的原因而开发的。原则上,它寻找的是一个大型组织的防御层中的漏洞,这些漏洞主要是行政管理方面的,而不是可能直接与事故有关的个人的过错。这一模式在应用于医疗保健时存在局限性,因为大多数错误或事故是在不断变化的微观社会文化环境背景下的个人技术或能力缺陷。因此,使用“瑞士奶酪”方法,过度依赖于寻找医疗保健系统问题,导致对医疗保健专业人员个人表现的关注减少,并避免了困难的文化工作场所问题。临床无效循环(cfc)是一种不良事件因果关系模型,主要关注直接医疗保健专业人员与患者之间以及医疗保健专业人员之间的相互作用。这一重点允许采取干预措施,解决诸如临床能力和保健环境文化等问题。后来发现广泛的肠和肝缺血,M夫人于第二天死于多器官衰竭(第6天)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信