How useful are non-blocking loads, stream buffers and speculative execution in multiple issue processors?

K. Farkas, N. Jouppi, P. Chow
{"title":"How useful are non-blocking loads, stream buffers and speculative execution in multiple issue processors?","authors":"K. Farkas, N. Jouppi, P. Chow","doi":"10.1109/HPCA.1995.386553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the relative performance impact of non-blocking loads, stream buffers, and speculative execution both used individually and in conjunction with each other. We have simulated the SPEC92 benchmarks on a statically scheduled quad-issue processor model, running code from the Multiflow compiler. Non-blocking loads and stream buffers both provide a significant performance advantage, and their combination performs significantly better than either alone. For example, with a 64-byte, 2-way set associative cache with 32 cycle fetch latency, non-blocking loads reduce the run-time by 21% while stream-buffers reduce it by 26%, and the combined use of the two yields a 47% reduction. The addition of speculative execution further improves the performance of the systems that we have simulated, with or without non-blocking loads and stream buffers, by an additional 20% to 4O%. We expect that the use of all three of these techniques will be important in future generations of microprocessors.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":330315,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1995 1st IEEE Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"72","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1995 1st IEEE Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCA.1995.386553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

Abstract

We investigate the relative performance impact of non-blocking loads, stream buffers, and speculative execution both used individually and in conjunction with each other. We have simulated the SPEC92 benchmarks on a statically scheduled quad-issue processor model, running code from the Multiflow compiler. Non-blocking loads and stream buffers both provide a significant performance advantage, and their combination performs significantly better than either alone. For example, with a 64-byte, 2-way set associative cache with 32 cycle fetch latency, non-blocking loads reduce the run-time by 21% while stream-buffers reduce it by 26%, and the combined use of the two yields a 47% reduction. The addition of speculative execution further improves the performance of the systems that we have simulated, with or without non-blocking loads and stream buffers, by an additional 20% to 4O%. We expect that the use of all three of these techniques will be important in future generations of microprocessors.<>
在多问题处理器中,非阻塞负载、流缓冲区和推测执行有多有用?
我们研究了非阻塞负载、流缓冲区和推测执行分别使用和相互结合使用的相对性能影响。我们在静态调度的四问题处理器模型上模拟了SPEC92基准测试,运行来自Multiflow编译器的代码。非阻塞负载和流缓冲区都提供了显著的性能优势,它们的组合比单独使用要好得多。例如,使用64字节、2路集合关联缓存和32周期获取延迟,非阻塞负载将运行时间减少21%,而流缓冲区将运行时间减少26%,两者结合使用可减少47%。推测执行的增加进一步提高了我们所模拟的系统的性能,无论是否有非阻塞负载和流缓冲区,都能额外提高20%到40%。我们期望这三种技术的使用在未来几代微处理器中都很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信