Global Politics and Religious Ethics Discourse: Between Tabatabai and Hamka

Purkon Hidayat
{"title":"Global Politics and Religious Ethics Discourse: Between Tabatabai and Hamka","authors":"Purkon Hidayat","doi":"10.35748/JURNALICMES.V2I2.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dynamics of global politics are increasingly complex. Various approaches commonly used to analyze these dynamics often fail to capture the essence of it so that new approaches are needed that take into account various dimensions, including ethics, which are starting to become a concern of related experts. Through Frost's approach to the important position of the normative paradigm in the study of International Relations, this article offers a discourse on religious ethics as the initial pioneering alternative thinking of political philosophy. In this article, the ethical theory of contemporary Iranian philosopher, Allamah Tabatabai, is explored with consideration that Middle Eastern geopolitics influenced the birth of this thought. The Tabatabai thought is elaborated with the idea of religious ethics from the great Southeast Asian thinker, Buya Hamka. The technical consideration for choosing these two figures is because there is a close interdisciplinary approach, namely interpretations, Sufism and philosophy. The study found a close link between the thought of Tabatabai and Hamka in religious ethics with global political issues. By carrying out further research, it is possible to elaborate this finding for developing the basis of the metatheory of Political Science and International Relations in Islamic perspective.","PeriodicalId":383581,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal ICMES","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal ICMES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35748/JURNALICMES.V2I2.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dynamics of global politics are increasingly complex. Various approaches commonly used to analyze these dynamics often fail to capture the essence of it so that new approaches are needed that take into account various dimensions, including ethics, which are starting to become a concern of related experts. Through Frost's approach to the important position of the normative paradigm in the study of International Relations, this article offers a discourse on religious ethics as the initial pioneering alternative thinking of political philosophy. In this article, the ethical theory of contemporary Iranian philosopher, Allamah Tabatabai, is explored with consideration that Middle Eastern geopolitics influenced the birth of this thought. The Tabatabai thought is elaborated with the idea of religious ethics from the great Southeast Asian thinker, Buya Hamka. The technical consideration for choosing these two figures is because there is a close interdisciplinary approach, namely interpretations, Sufism and philosophy. The study found a close link between the thought of Tabatabai and Hamka in religious ethics with global political issues. By carrying out further research, it is possible to elaborate this finding for developing the basis of the metatheory of Political Science and International Relations in Islamic perspective.
全球政治与宗教伦理话语:塔巴塔巴伊与哈姆卡之间
全球政治的动态越来越复杂。通常用于分析这些动态的各种方法往往不能捕捉到它的本质,因此需要考虑到各种维度的新方法,包括伦理,这开始成为相关专家关注的问题。本文通过弗罗斯特对规范范式在国际关系研究中的重要地位的探讨,对宗教伦理作为政治哲学最初的开创性替代思维进行了论述。本文探讨了当代伊朗哲学家阿拉玛·塔巴塔巴伊的伦理理论,并考虑到中东地缘政治对这一思想产生的影响。Tabatabai思想是由东南亚伟大思想家Buya Hamka的宗教伦理思想所阐述的。选择这两个人物的技术考虑是因为有一个紧密的跨学科方法,即解释,苏菲主义和哲学。研究发现,塔巴塔巴伊和哈姆卡的宗教伦理思想与全球政治问题之间存在密切联系。通过开展进一步的研究,有可能详细阐述这一发现,以发展伊斯兰视角下政治学和国际关系元理论的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信