{"title":"Critical Discourse Studies of Language and Sexuality","authors":"Veronika Koller","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190212926.013.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at how sexuality, including sexual identity, has been addressed in critical discourse studies. It will first review previous work (e.g., Marko 2008; Morrish and Sauntson 2011) and point out the relative lack of relevant studies in this area, given that research into language and sexuality is mostly indebted to anthropology, sociolinguistics, and conversation analysis. Building on queer discourse studies (Motschenbacher and Stegu 2013), the chapter suggests a way of critically analyzing discourses on sexuality, where discourse is defined as textually mediated social action, with text producers utilizing linguistic resources and sociocognitive representations to establish, maintain, or challenge power relations. Critical discourse studies combine the description of linguistic features with their interpretation and explanation in context and ultimately make transparent the way in which language and discourse either construct and reinforce, or challenge and subvert, normativity. The chapter closes with an illustrative example of the discursive construction of lesbian identities.","PeriodicalId":153363,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190212926.013.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter looks at how sexuality, including sexual identity, has been addressed in critical discourse studies. It will first review previous work (e.g., Marko 2008; Morrish and Sauntson 2011) and point out the relative lack of relevant studies in this area, given that research into language and sexuality is mostly indebted to anthropology, sociolinguistics, and conversation analysis. Building on queer discourse studies (Motschenbacher and Stegu 2013), the chapter suggests a way of critically analyzing discourses on sexuality, where discourse is defined as textually mediated social action, with text producers utilizing linguistic resources and sociocognitive representations to establish, maintain, or challenge power relations. Critical discourse studies combine the description of linguistic features with their interpretation and explanation in context and ultimately make transparent the way in which language and discourse either construct and reinforce, or challenge and subvert, normativity. The chapter closes with an illustrative example of the discursive construction of lesbian identities.
这一章着眼于性,包括性身份,是如何在批判话语研究中被处理的。它将首先审查以前的工作(例如,Marko 2008;Morrish and Sauntson 2011),并指出这一领域的相关研究相对缺乏,因为对语言和性的研究主要归功于人类学、社会语言学和对话分析。在酷儿话语研究(Motschenbacher and Stegu 2013)的基础上,本章提出了一种批判性地分析性话语的方法,其中话语被定义为文本中介的社会行为,文本生产者利用语言资源和社会认知表征来建立、维持或挑战权力关系。批评话语研究将语言特征的描述与语境中的解释和解释结合起来,最终使语言和话语构建和加强规范性或挑战和颠覆规范性的方式变得透明。这一章以一个关于女同性恋身份的话语建构的说明性例子结束。