Coordination Without Prior Agreement

G. Taubenfeld
{"title":"Coordination Without Prior Agreement","authors":"G. Taubenfeld","doi":"10.1145/3087801.3087807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assuming that there is an a priori agreement between processes on the names of shared memory locations, as done in almost all the publications on shared memory algorithms, is tantamount to assuming that agreement has already been solved at the lower-level. From a theoretical point of view, it is intriguing to figure out how coordination can be achieved without relying on such lower-level agreement. In order to better understand the new model, we have designed new algorithms without relying on such a priori lower-level agreement, and proved space lower bounds and impossibility results for several important problems, such as mutual exclusion, consensus, election and renaming. Using these results, we identify fundamental differences between the standard model where there is a lower-level agreement about the shared register's names and the strictly weaker model where there is no such agreement.","PeriodicalId":324970,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3087801.3087807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Assuming that there is an a priori agreement between processes on the names of shared memory locations, as done in almost all the publications on shared memory algorithms, is tantamount to assuming that agreement has already been solved at the lower-level. From a theoretical point of view, it is intriguing to figure out how coordination can be achieved without relying on such lower-level agreement. In order to better understand the new model, we have designed new algorithms without relying on such a priori lower-level agreement, and proved space lower bounds and impossibility results for several important problems, such as mutual exclusion, consensus, election and renaming. Using these results, we identify fundamental differences between the standard model where there is a lower-level agreement about the shared register's names and the strictly weaker model where there is no such agreement.
未经事先协议的协调
假设进程之间在共享内存位置的名称上有一个先验的协议,就像几乎所有关于共享内存算法的出版物中所做的那样,就等于假设协议已经在较低级别上得到了解决。从理论的角度来看,如何在不依赖于这种较低级别的协议的情况下实现协调是一个有趣的问题。为了更好地理解新模型,我们设计了不依赖于这种先验低级协议的新算法,并对互斥、共识、选举和重命名等几个重要问题证明了空间下界和不可能结果。使用这些结果,我们确定了关于共享寄存器名称的较低级协议的标准模型和没有这种协议的严格较弱模型之间的根本区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信