Estimating the welfare effect of food price increase on households in Nigeria: Direct and substitution effect approach

O. Adebola, Ogunniyi Laudia Titilola, Fanifosi Gbenga Emmanuel
{"title":"Estimating the welfare effect of food price increase on households in Nigeria: Direct and substitution effect approach","authors":"O. Adebola, Ogunniyi Laudia Titilola, Fanifosi Gbenga Emmanuel","doi":"10.18488/ijsar.v10i1.3252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increases in food prices in Nigeria have raised huge concerns on the impact welfare of poor households who have substantial share of their spending on food. This study investigated the welfare effects (including the direct and substitution effects) of food price changes on households in Nigeria. The study employed time series data on food prices from 1991-2013 and household survey data obtained from the National household Survey (wave 2). We group household consumption expenditure on different food and non-food commodities into nine (9) namely; fish, meat, pulses, fruit & vegetable, fat & oil, beverages, wheat, rice, corn, and others. Welfare effect was analyzed by compensating variation. The results showed that a safety net program would net to transfer an amount equivalent to 0.76%, 0.26% and 1.02% of the total national consumption to fully compensate the poorest quintile in rural, urban and at the national level respectively. And also, in the richest losers’ quintile about 1.29% of the aggregate national consumption will be required by a safety net program to fully compensate them overall. The study concluded that food price changes related significantly with welfare status of the respondents as tested by CV model. Welfare gain was enjoyed mostly by urban household whose mean compensated variation was as high as 18% compared with 14% for rural household.","PeriodicalId":147153,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18488/ijsar.v10i1.3252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increases in food prices in Nigeria have raised huge concerns on the impact welfare of poor households who have substantial share of their spending on food. This study investigated the welfare effects (including the direct and substitution effects) of food price changes on households in Nigeria. The study employed time series data on food prices from 1991-2013 and household survey data obtained from the National household Survey (wave 2). We group household consumption expenditure on different food and non-food commodities into nine (9) namely; fish, meat, pulses, fruit & vegetable, fat & oil, beverages, wheat, rice, corn, and others. Welfare effect was analyzed by compensating variation. The results showed that a safety net program would net to transfer an amount equivalent to 0.76%, 0.26% and 1.02% of the total national consumption to fully compensate the poorest quintile in rural, urban and at the national level respectively. And also, in the richest losers’ quintile about 1.29% of the aggregate national consumption will be required by a safety net program to fully compensate them overall. The study concluded that food price changes related significantly with welfare status of the respondents as tested by CV model. Welfare gain was enjoyed mostly by urban household whose mean compensated variation was as high as 18% compared with 14% for rural household.
估计尼日利亚食品价格上涨对家庭的福利影响:直接和替代效应方法
尼日利亚食品价格的上涨引起了人们对贫困家庭福利影响的巨大担忧,这些家庭的大部分支出都花在了食品上。本研究调查了尼日利亚食品价格变化对家庭的福利影响(包括直接和替代效应)。本研究采用1991-2013年的食品价格时间序列数据和全国住户调查(第二波)的住户调查数据。我们将不同食品和非食品类商品的住户消费支出分为九类:鱼,肉,豆类,水果和蔬菜,脂肪和油,饮料,小麦,大米,玉米等。通过补偿变异分析福利效应。结果表明,在农村、城市和国家层面,一个社会保障项目将分别需要支付相当于全国消费总额0.76%、0.26%和1.02%的资金,以充分补偿最贫困的五分之一人口。而且,在最富有的五分之一的失败者中,社会保障计划将需要全国总消费的1.29%来全面补偿他们。研究结果表明,食品价格变化对被调查者的福利状况有显著的影响。福利收益主要由城市家庭享有,其平均补偿变化高达18%,而农村家庭为14%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信