How does the construal level affect consumers’ intention to adopt product ratings and individual reviews?

Caner Çeşmeci̇, Sebnem Burnaz
{"title":"How does the construal level affect consumers’ intention to adopt product ratings and individual reviews?","authors":"Caner Çeşmeci̇, Sebnem Burnaz","doi":"10.15295/bmij.v10i4.2146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to examine how and why consumers’ intention to adopt aggregate review metrics (ARM) (e.g., product ratings) versus individual reviews (IR) (e.g., specific review texts) in an online shopping setting is differentially affected when both types of cues are salient. First, we provide a novel conceptualization of ARM as a “base rate cue” consisting of abstract, aggregated, category-level, and pallid elements; likewise, IR as a “case information cue” consisting of concrete, characteristi, and vivid elements. Construal level theory constitutes the theoretical foundation of this study. The research includes two major studies. First, a list of elements that influence the relative importance of the cue types (i.e., ARM vs IR) on consumer decision-making is compiled using in-depth interviews. Then, a pilot and an experimental study are designed to test our hypothesis. Findings prove that consumers’ intention to adopt IR (ARM) is increased (decreased) when they are in a concrete mind-set. Likewise, consumers’ intention to adopt the ARM (IR) is increased (decreased) when they are in the abstract mind-set. The results contribute to the existing literature on electronic word of mouth (eWOM) and construal level theory, as well as provide novel insights for managers as to the prioritization of cue types in line with the mental construal of consumers.","PeriodicalId":253954,"journal":{"name":"Business & Management Studies: An International Journal","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business & Management Studies: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v10i4.2146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to examine how and why consumers’ intention to adopt aggregate review metrics (ARM) (e.g., product ratings) versus individual reviews (IR) (e.g., specific review texts) in an online shopping setting is differentially affected when both types of cues are salient. First, we provide a novel conceptualization of ARM as a “base rate cue” consisting of abstract, aggregated, category-level, and pallid elements; likewise, IR as a “case information cue” consisting of concrete, characteristi, and vivid elements. Construal level theory constitutes the theoretical foundation of this study. The research includes two major studies. First, a list of elements that influence the relative importance of the cue types (i.e., ARM vs IR) on consumer decision-making is compiled using in-depth interviews. Then, a pilot and an experimental study are designed to test our hypothesis. Findings prove that consumers’ intention to adopt IR (ARM) is increased (decreased) when they are in a concrete mind-set. Likewise, consumers’ intention to adopt the ARM (IR) is increased (decreased) when they are in the abstract mind-set. The results contribute to the existing literature on electronic word of mouth (eWOM) and construal level theory, as well as provide novel insights for managers as to the prioritization of cue types in line with the mental construal of consumers.
解释水平如何影响消费者采用产品评级和个人评论的意愿?
该研究旨在研究当两种类型的线索都很突出时,消费者在网上购物环境中采用总体评论指标(ARM)(例如,产品评级)与个人评论(IR)(例如,特定评论文本)的意图是如何以及为什么会受到不同的影响。首先,我们提出了一个新的概念,ARM作为一个“基本率线索”,由抽象的、聚合的、类别级的和苍白的元素组成;同样,IR作为一个“案例信息线索”,由具体、特征和生动的元素组成。解释水平理论是本研究的理论基础。该研究包括两项主要研究。首先,通过深度访谈,编制了影响提示类型(即ARM与IR)对消费者决策的相对重要性的元素列表。然后,设计一个试点和实验研究来验证我们的假设。研究结果表明,当消费者处于具体的思维定势时,他们采用IR (ARM)的意愿会增加(减少)。同样,当消费者处于抽象思维模式时,他们采用ARM (IR)的意愿会增加(减少)。研究结果对现有的电子口碑理论和解释水平理论进行了补充,并为管理者根据消费者的心理解释选择线索类型的优先级提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信