How Long and What For? Tracking a Nationally Representative Sample to Quantify Internet Use

Noemi Festic, Moritz Büchi, M. Latzer
{"title":"How Long and What For? Tracking a Nationally Representative Sample to Quantify Internet Use","authors":"Noemi Festic, Moritz Büchi, M. Latzer","doi":"10.51685/JQD.2021.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testing communication theories requires a valid empirical basis, yet especially for usage time measures, retrospective self-reports have shown to be biased. This study draws on a unique data set of 923 Swiss internet users who had their internet use tracked for at least 30 days on mobile and desktop devices and took part in a survey covering internet usage as well as person-level background variables. The analysis focuses on active usage time overall and on the major services Google Search, YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, and the online newspaper 20 Minuten. The results showed that overall internet usage time was lower for older and higher-educated users based on both the tracking and survey data, and the reported usage time was consistently higher than the tracked usage time. The tracking data further revealed that internet users in all social groups spent the majority of their time online on a mobile device. The number of users of the major services varied mainly between age groups. These differences were less pronounced when it came to the time users spent engaging with these services. Over the course of a day, the major services varied in their frequency of use: for example, messaging peaked before noon and in the late afternoon, whereas online news use was comparably constant at a lower level.","PeriodicalId":361748,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Technology eJournal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Technology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51685/JQD.2021.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Testing communication theories requires a valid empirical basis, yet especially for usage time measures, retrospective self-reports have shown to be biased. This study draws on a unique data set of 923 Swiss internet users who had their internet use tracked for at least 30 days on mobile and desktop devices and took part in a survey covering internet usage as well as person-level background variables. The analysis focuses on active usage time overall and on the major services Google Search, YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, and the online newspaper 20 Minuten. The results showed that overall internet usage time was lower for older and higher-educated users based on both the tracking and survey data, and the reported usage time was consistently higher than the tracked usage time. The tracking data further revealed that internet users in all social groups spent the majority of their time online on a mobile device. The number of users of the major services varied mainly between age groups. These differences were less pronounced when it came to the time users spent engaging with these services. Over the course of a day, the major services varied in their frequency of use: for example, messaging peaked before noon and in the late afternoon, whereas online news use was comparably constant at a lower level.
多长时间,做什么?追踪具有全国代表性的样本以量化互联网使用
测试沟通理论需要一个有效的经验基础,但特别是对于使用时间的测量,回顾性的自我报告已经显示出偏见。这项研究利用了923名瑞士互联网用户的独特数据集,这些用户在移动和桌面设备上的互联网使用情况被跟踪了至少30天,并参与了一项涵盖互联网使用情况和个人背景变量的调查。该分析主要关注总体活跃使用时间,以及谷歌搜索、YouTube、WhatsApp、Instagram、Facebook和在线报纸《20分钟》等主要服务。结果显示,根据跟踪和调查数据,年龄较大和受教育程度较高的用户的总体互联网使用时间较低,报告的使用时间始终高于跟踪的使用时间。跟踪数据进一步显示,所有社交群体的互联网用户大部分上网时间都是在移动设备上度过的。主要服务的用户人数主要因年龄组而异。当谈到用户花在这些服务上的时间时,这些差异就不那么明显了。在一天的过程中,主要服务的使用频率各不相同:例如,短信在中午之前和下午晚些时候达到峰值,而在线新闻的使用相对稳定,处于较低的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信