Mediations of 'the Refugee Crisis': The (Ir)reconciliation of Ideological Contradictions in Fortress Europe

A. Harrison
{"title":"Mediations of 'the Refugee Crisis': The (Ir)reconciliation of Ideological Contradictions in Fortress Europe","authors":"A. Harrison","doi":"10.31165/NK.2016.94.445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the UK, the summer of 2015 saw the national popular press and public imagination captivated by the ‘refugee crisis’. On both mass and social media sites, public opinion predominantly orientated around two major narratives. On one hand, amidst the dramatic scenes in Calais (as well as elsewhere), the European media worked into a fervour of fear, amid concerns about the ‘swarms’ of migrants purported to be ‘invading’ Europe (Squires 2015, The Telegraph). Taking a theoretical focus through Agamben’s work and giving reverence to where his concerns converge with aspects of postcolonial theory, the following investigation unpacks how the hegemonic (new) media narratives have intensely cycled into an emotionally charged dichotomous discourse obfuscating a multitude of other key considerations. Employing content analysis, this article reads three cultural texts scraped from social media to discuss the ways in which the construction of the refugee identity has been shaped in the public imagination; it calls into question how forefronting the figure of the refugee has foreclosed wider debates about alternative agendas contributing to the processes of Fortressing Europe.","PeriodicalId":299414,"journal":{"name":"Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31165/NK.2016.94.445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In the UK, the summer of 2015 saw the national popular press and public imagination captivated by the ‘refugee crisis’. On both mass and social media sites, public opinion predominantly orientated around two major narratives. On one hand, amidst the dramatic scenes in Calais (as well as elsewhere), the European media worked into a fervour of fear, amid concerns about the ‘swarms’ of migrants purported to be ‘invading’ Europe (Squires 2015, The Telegraph). Taking a theoretical focus through Agamben’s work and giving reverence to where his concerns converge with aspects of postcolonial theory, the following investigation unpacks how the hegemonic (new) media narratives have intensely cycled into an emotionally charged dichotomous discourse obfuscating a multitude of other key considerations. Employing content analysis, this article reads three cultural texts scraped from social media to discuss the ways in which the construction of the refugee identity has been shaped in the public imagination; it calls into question how forefronting the figure of the refugee has foreclosed wider debates about alternative agendas contributing to the processes of Fortressing Europe.
“难民危机”的调解:堡垒欧洲意识形态矛盾的和解
在英国,2015年夏天,全国大众媒体和公众的想象力都被“难民危机”所吸引。在大众和社交媒体网站上,公众舆论主要围绕两大叙事展开。一方面,在加莱(以及其他地方)的戏剧性场景中,欧洲媒体陷入了一种狂热的恐惧之中,担心“成群”的移民据称正在“入侵”欧洲(Squires 2015, the Telegraph)。通过对阿甘本作品的理论关注,并对他的关注与后殖民理论方面的汇合给予尊重,下面的调查揭示了霸权(新)媒体叙事如何强烈地循环成一种充满情感的两分法话语,混淆了许多其他关键考虑。本文运用内容分析法,阅读从社交媒体中抓取的三个文化文本,探讨难民身份建构在公众想象中的塑造方式;它提出了一个问题,即突出难民的形象如何阻止了有关促进“堡垒欧洲”进程的其他议程的更广泛辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信