Quantity Recommendation as a Solution to Imbalanced Fertilizer Use? A Field Experiment in Bangladesh

Sabrin Beg, M. Islam, K. Rahman
{"title":"Quantity Recommendation as a Solution to Imbalanced Fertilizer Use? A Field Experiment in Bangladesh","authors":"Sabrin Beg, M. Islam, K. Rahman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3619385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use a field experiment in Bangladesh to test if two types of variety-specific fertilizer recommendations---government provided, community-level recommendations and plot-specific recommendations based on individual soil tests---affect fertilizer use, yield, and profits. Treatment farmers do not change their fertilizer application behavior in response to either recommendation. One exception is the case of TSP (phosphate fertilizer), which is recommended for all crops but recommended quantities are significantly lower than the baseline average usage. Treatment farmers over-react to the recommendations by stopping TSP use after the intervention. In the soil-testing treatment arm farmers also shift their seed choice to varieties for which their baseline fertilizer consumption aligns with the recommendation. Opting out of using TSP, an essential fertilizer, ultimately hurts productivity as farmers in the community-based recommendation arm experience a 6.6% yield reduction. Attention costs may explain the extensive margin but no intensive margin effect in response to the treatments.","PeriodicalId":232874,"journal":{"name":"AgriSciRN: Fertigation (Sub-Topic)","volume":" 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgriSciRN: Fertigation (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3619385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We use a field experiment in Bangladesh to test if two types of variety-specific fertilizer recommendations---government provided, community-level recommendations and plot-specific recommendations based on individual soil tests---affect fertilizer use, yield, and profits. Treatment farmers do not change their fertilizer application behavior in response to either recommendation. One exception is the case of TSP (phosphate fertilizer), which is recommended for all crops but recommended quantities are significantly lower than the baseline average usage. Treatment farmers over-react to the recommendations by stopping TSP use after the intervention. In the soil-testing treatment arm farmers also shift their seed choice to varieties for which their baseline fertilizer consumption aligns with the recommendation. Opting out of using TSP, an essential fertilizer, ultimately hurts productivity as farmers in the community-based recommendation arm experience a 6.6% yield reduction. Attention costs may explain the extensive margin but no intensive margin effect in response to the treatments.
用量推荐是解决化肥使用不平衡的方法吗?孟加拉国的实地试验
我们在孟加拉国进行了一项实地试验,以测试两种特定品种的肥料建议——政府提供的、社区一级的建议和基于个别土壤试验的特定地块的建议——是否会影响肥料的使用、产量和利润。处理农民不改变他们的施肥行为,以响应任何一个建议。一个例外是TSP(磷肥),它被推荐用于所有作物,但推荐的量明显低于基线平均使用量。治疗农民在干预后停止使用TSP,对建议反应过度。在土壤测试处理中,农民也将他们的种子选择转向他们的基准肥料消耗量与建议一致的品种。选择不使用TSP(一种重要的肥料)最终会损害生产力,因为社区推荐部门的农民产量会减少6.6%。注意成本可以解释对治疗反应的广泛边际效应,但不能解释强化边际效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信