Evaluation of upper body postural assessment of forklift driving using a single-depth camera

Veeresh Elango, Simona Petravic, L. Hanson
{"title":"Evaluation of upper body postural assessment of forklift driving using a single-depth camera","authors":"Veeresh Elango, Simona Petravic, L. Hanson","doi":"10.17077/dhm.31780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Observational postural assessment methods which are commonly used in industry are time consuming and have issues of inter- and intra-rater reliability. Computer vision (CV) based methods have been proposed, but they have mainly been tested inside lab environments. This study aims to develop and evaluate an upper body postural assessment system in a real industry environment using a single depth camera and OpenPose for the task of forklift driving. The results were compared with XSens, an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) based system. Data from three forklift drivers performing seven indoor and outdoor tasks were recorded with a depth camera and XSens sensors. The data were then analyzed with OpenPose with additional custom processing. The angles calculated by the computer vision system showed small errors compared to the XSens system and generally followed the trend of the XSens system joint angle values. However, the results after applying ergonomic thresholds were vastly different and the two systems rarely agreed. These findings suggest that the CV system needs further study to improve the robustness on self-occlusion and angle calculations. Also, XSens needs further study to assess its consistency and reliability in industrial environments.","PeriodicalId":111717,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Digital Human Modeling Symposium (DHM 2022) and Iowa Virtual Human Summit 2022 -","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Digital Human Modeling Symposium (DHM 2022) and Iowa Virtual Human Summit 2022 -","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17077/dhm.31780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observational postural assessment methods which are commonly used in industry are time consuming and have issues of inter- and intra-rater reliability. Computer vision (CV) based methods have been proposed, but they have mainly been tested inside lab environments. This study aims to develop and evaluate an upper body postural assessment system in a real industry environment using a single depth camera and OpenPose for the task of forklift driving. The results were compared with XSens, an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) based system. Data from three forklift drivers performing seven indoor and outdoor tasks were recorded with a depth camera and XSens sensors. The data were then analyzed with OpenPose with additional custom processing. The angles calculated by the computer vision system showed small errors compared to the XSens system and generally followed the trend of the XSens system joint angle values. However, the results after applying ergonomic thresholds were vastly different and the two systems rarely agreed. These findings suggest that the CV system needs further study to improve the robustness on self-occlusion and angle calculations. Also, XSens needs further study to assess its consistency and reliability in industrial environments.
基于单深度摄像机的叉车驾驶上体姿态评估
工业上常用的观察性姿势评估方法耗时长,且存在评分间和评分内可靠性的问题。基于计算机视觉(CV)的方法已经被提出,但它们主要是在实验室环境中进行测试。本研究旨在开发和评估一个真实工业环境下的上身姿势评估系统,该系统使用单深度相机和OpenPose来完成叉车驾驶任务。结果与基于惯性测量单元(IMU)的XSens系统进行了比较。使用深度摄像机和XSens传感器记录了三名叉车司机执行七项室内和室外任务的数据。然后使用OpenPose对数据进行分析,并进行额外的定制处理。计算机视觉系统计算的角度与XSens系统计算的角度相比误差较小,基本符合XSens系统关节角度值的变化趋势。然而,应用人体工程学阈值后的结果差异很大,两种系统很少一致。这些发现表明,CV系统需要进一步研究以提高自遮挡和角度计算的鲁棒性。此外,XSens还需要进一步研究,以评估其在工业环境中的一致性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信