OBLIGATION TO PRAY FOR MEDICAL STAFF USED PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)

Mohamad Amzarul Nidzar Bin Zakaria
{"title":"OBLIGATION TO PRAY FOR MEDICAL STAFF USED PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)","authors":"Mohamad Amzarul Nidzar Bin Zakaria","doi":"10.22373/ijomafim.v1i1.2756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the conditions for prayer is purification, either by ablution or tayammum, but there are situations where people cannot purify due to an emergency. Among them are medical staff who wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to treat Covid-19 patients. This article compares the opinions of the Ḥanafī, Mālikī, Syāfi‘ī, and Ḥanbalī schools of thought about praying without purification due to an emergency. This study is a normative legal research that uses a comparative approach and is a type of literature research. This study finds that the Mālikī school of thought considers purification as the condition of obligatory prayer, so there is no obligation to pray for those hindered from purification. As for other schools of thought, purification is a condition for the validity of praying, so prayer is still obligatory even without ablution or tayammum. The author concludes that praying is still an obligation for medical staff who wear PPE. However, he must act according to the situation he experienced because he can join two prayers at one time.","PeriodicalId":304169,"journal":{"name":"IJoMaFiM: Indonesian Journal of Maqasid and Fiqh Muqaran","volume":"41 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJoMaFiM: Indonesian Journal of Maqasid and Fiqh Muqaran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22373/ijomafim.v1i1.2756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the conditions for prayer is purification, either by ablution or tayammum, but there are situations where people cannot purify due to an emergency. Among them are medical staff who wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to treat Covid-19 patients. This article compares the opinions of the Ḥanafī, Mālikī, Syāfi‘ī, and Ḥanbalī schools of thought about praying without purification due to an emergency. This study is a normative legal research that uses a comparative approach and is a type of literature research. This study finds that the Mālikī school of thought considers purification as the condition of obligatory prayer, so there is no obligation to pray for those hindered from purification. As for other schools of thought, purification is a condition for the validity of praying, so prayer is still obligatory even without ablution or tayammum. The author concludes that praying is still an obligation for medical staff who wear PPE. However, he must act according to the situation he experienced because he can join two prayers at one time.
为使用个人防护装备的医务人员祈祷的义务
祈祷的条件之一是净化,要么通过沐浴,要么通过tayamum,但也有由于紧急情况而无法净化的情况。其中包括穿着个人防护装备(PPE)治疗Covid-19患者的医务人员。本文比较了Ḥanafī、Mālikī、Syāfi’’和Ḥanbalī学派关于紧急情况下不净化祈祷的观点。本研究是一项采用比较方法的规范性法律研究,属于文献研究类型。本研究发现Mālikī学派认为净化是义务祈祷的条件,因此没有义务为那些无法净化的人祈祷。至于其他思想流派,净化是祈祷的有效性的一个条件,所以祈祷仍然是强制性的,即使没有洗礼或tayamum。作者的结论是,祈祷仍然是佩戴个人防护装备的医务人员的义务。然而,他必须根据他所经历的情况行事,因为他可以同时加入两个祈祷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信