Current and wave measurements in support of the Chesapeake Bay Interpretive Buoy System

W. D. Wilson, E. Siegel
{"title":"Current and wave measurements in support of the Chesapeake Bay Interpretive Buoy System","authors":"W. D. Wilson, E. Siegel","doi":"10.1109/CWTM.2011.5759533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Chesapeake Bay Interpretive Buoys System (CBIBS, www.buoybay.org) is - at present - a 9-buoy system of observational buoy platforms located around the Chesapeake Bay, operated bythe NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office. The buoys themselves are AXYS Watchkeeper buoys based on the Tideland Signal SB 138 P hull, moored with all chain rode with a 2.5∶1 scope. All of the buoys have downward looking NORTEK AquaDopp 1 mHz profilers mounted in the hulls; six of the buoys are equipped with AXYS TriAXYS OEM wave measurement modules. To evaluate the performance of these buoy mounted sensors, concurrent wave and current profile data were collected at one site (34 days of data at the SN ‘Six Foot Knoll’ buoy, 21 foot depth) using an adjacent bottom-mounted 1 mHz NORTEK Acoustic Wave and Current (AWAC) instrument. Using one Hz overlapping single ping current profile data, the following conclusions were reached: • Ten minute averages calculated and transmitted by the AXYS Watchman controller accurately represent internally recorded current profiler data (however the comparison revealed a correctable Watchman firmware error); • Over four 1-meter bins, absolute differences in magnitude among 10 minute means of AquaDopp and AWAC currents are less than 0.005 meters/second, with standard deviations of 0.02 – 0.03 meters/second; • Absolute differences in direction over the same bins were 7–10 degrees. By only including velocities in excess of 0.1 meters/second, direction errors were reduced by nearly one half; • AWAC and buoy currents were subjected to harmonic tidal analysis at each level. Differences in the orientation of the major axis of the tidal ellipses were 0.3 to 1.6 degrees; • Current measurement accuracy was not affected by sea state / buoy motion, at least up to the 1.5 meter waves heights experienced during this comparison; • An analysis of the ‘errors’ (assuming AWAC data as the standard) shows that accuracy does not improve after 120 pings (2 minutes) of averaging. In a power-limited environment such as a buoy, this is a significant result. Typical Chesapeake Bay wind waves - one to three feet height, two to three second period - are difficult to measure with a 1300-pound 1.75 meter diameter buoy. But accurately distinguishing between 1 and 2 foot waves is important to many of the small craft boaters using the CBIBS system. In comparing the TriAXYS (20 minute sample) and AWAC (2 Hz, 2048 samples) wave measurements, we found that for simple wave parameters of interest to us - maximum wave height and mean direction - the instruments were in good agreement. A linear fit to maximum wave heights had a slope / intercept of 1.05 / .02 (meters) . Similarly, comparison of mean wave direction from both instruments agreed well, with slope/intercept of 1.01 / –5.1 (degrees).","PeriodicalId":345178,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE/OES 10th Current, Waves and Turbulence Measurements (CWTM)","volume":"296 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE/OES 10th Current, Waves and Turbulence Measurements (CWTM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CWTM.2011.5759533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The Chesapeake Bay Interpretive Buoys System (CBIBS, www.buoybay.org) is - at present - a 9-buoy system of observational buoy platforms located around the Chesapeake Bay, operated bythe NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office. The buoys themselves are AXYS Watchkeeper buoys based on the Tideland Signal SB 138 P hull, moored with all chain rode with a 2.5∶1 scope. All of the buoys have downward looking NORTEK AquaDopp 1 mHz profilers mounted in the hulls; six of the buoys are equipped with AXYS TriAXYS OEM wave measurement modules. To evaluate the performance of these buoy mounted sensors, concurrent wave and current profile data were collected at one site (34 days of data at the SN ‘Six Foot Knoll’ buoy, 21 foot depth) using an adjacent bottom-mounted 1 mHz NORTEK Acoustic Wave and Current (AWAC) instrument. Using one Hz overlapping single ping current profile data, the following conclusions were reached: • Ten minute averages calculated and transmitted by the AXYS Watchman controller accurately represent internally recorded current profiler data (however the comparison revealed a correctable Watchman firmware error); • Over four 1-meter bins, absolute differences in magnitude among 10 minute means of AquaDopp and AWAC currents are less than 0.005 meters/second, with standard deviations of 0.02 – 0.03 meters/second; • Absolute differences in direction over the same bins were 7–10 degrees. By only including velocities in excess of 0.1 meters/second, direction errors were reduced by nearly one half; • AWAC and buoy currents were subjected to harmonic tidal analysis at each level. Differences in the orientation of the major axis of the tidal ellipses were 0.3 to 1.6 degrees; • Current measurement accuracy was not affected by sea state / buoy motion, at least up to the 1.5 meter waves heights experienced during this comparison; • An analysis of the ‘errors’ (assuming AWAC data as the standard) shows that accuracy does not improve after 120 pings (2 minutes) of averaging. In a power-limited environment such as a buoy, this is a significant result. Typical Chesapeake Bay wind waves - one to three feet height, two to three second period - are difficult to measure with a 1300-pound 1.75 meter diameter buoy. But accurately distinguishing between 1 and 2 foot waves is important to many of the small craft boaters using the CBIBS system. In comparing the TriAXYS (20 minute sample) and AWAC (2 Hz, 2048 samples) wave measurements, we found that for simple wave parameters of interest to us - maximum wave height and mean direction - the instruments were in good agreement. A linear fit to maximum wave heights had a slope / intercept of 1.05 / .02 (meters) . Similarly, comparison of mean wave direction from both instruments agreed well, with slope/intercept of 1.01 / –5.1 (degrees).
支持切萨皮克湾解释浮标系统的海流和波浪测量
切萨皮克湾解释浮标系统(CBIBS, www.buoybay.org)目前是一个由9个浮标组成的观测浮标平台系统,位于切萨皮克湾周围,由NOAA切萨皮克湾办公室运营。浮标本身是基于tiland Signal SB 138p船体的AXYS Watchkeeper浮标,系泊时采用全锚链,瞄准镜为2.5∶1。所有浮标都有向下看的NORTEK AquaDopp 1 mHz剖面仪安装在船体上;其中6个浮标配备了AXYS TriAXYS OEM波浪测量模块。为了评估这些浮标传感器的性能,使用相邻的底部安装的1 mHz NORTEK声波和电流(AWAC)仪器,在一个地点(SN ' Six Foot Knoll '浮标,21英尺深,34天的数据)收集了同步波和电流剖面数据。使用一赫兹重叠的单ping电流配置数据,得出以下结论:•由AXYS Watchman控制器计算和传输的十分钟平均值准确地表示内部记录的电流配置数据(然而,比较显示了可纠正的Watchman固件错误);•在4个1米箱中,AquaDopp和AWAC电流10分钟平均值的绝对值差小于0.005米/秒,标准差为0.02 - 0.03米/秒;•在相同的箱子上,方向的绝对差异为7-10度。通过只包括超过0.1米/秒的速度,方向误差减少了近一半;•AWAC和浮标洋流在每个水平进行谐波潮汐分析。潮汐椭圆长轴方向差0.3 ~ 1.6度;•目前的测量精度不受海况/浮标运动的影响,至少在本次比较期间经历的1.5米海浪高度;•对“误差”的分析(假设AWAC数据为标准)表明,在平均120 ping(2分钟)后,精度并没有提高。在动力有限的环境中,如浮标,这是一个重要的结果。切萨皮克湾典型的风浪——1到3英尺高,周期2到3秒——很难用一个1300磅、直径1.75米的浮标来测量。但是,对于许多使用CBIBS系统的小型艇手来说,准确区分1英尺和2英尺的海浪非常重要。在比较TriAXYS(20分钟采样)和AWAC (2 Hz, 2048个采样)波浪测量时,我们发现对于我们感兴趣的简单波浪参数-最大波高和平均方向-仪器是很一致的。对最大波高的线性拟合斜率/截距为1.05 / 0.02(米)。同样,两种仪器的平均波向比较一致,斜率/截距为1.01 / -5.1(度)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信