How Can Automated Vehicles Explain Their Driving Decisions? Generating Clarifying Summaries Automatically

Franziska Henze, Dennis Fassbender, C. Stiller
{"title":"How Can Automated Vehicles Explain Their Driving Decisions? Generating Clarifying Summaries Automatically","authors":"Franziska Henze, Dennis Fassbender, C. Stiller","doi":"10.1109/iv51971.2022.9827197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One way to increase user acceptance in automated vehicles is to explain their driving decisions, but current methods still involve human interpretations and are thus prone to errors. Therefore, the presented method formulates summaries that clarify the automated vehicle’s driving decision by extracting all necessary information automatically from the planning algorithm. This paper shows the generation of three exemplary statement types and their validation with an online survey that investigated users’ preferences. The results suggest that participants favor statements describing information that affect the driving decision as well as applicable traffic rules. Additionally, individual information needs should be considered when constructing modular explanations. Although this analysis does not consider sophisticated human machine interfaces nor real traffic scenarios, it does show, for the first time, how satisfying statements can be generated using a planning algorithm without any human-induced bias. This is an important step towards self-contained transparency of automated driving functions and can therefore lay the basis for future human machine interfaces.","PeriodicalId":184622,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iv51971.2022.9827197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One way to increase user acceptance in automated vehicles is to explain their driving decisions, but current methods still involve human interpretations and are thus prone to errors. Therefore, the presented method formulates summaries that clarify the automated vehicle’s driving decision by extracting all necessary information automatically from the planning algorithm. This paper shows the generation of three exemplary statement types and their validation with an online survey that investigated users’ preferences. The results suggest that participants favor statements describing information that affect the driving decision as well as applicable traffic rules. Additionally, individual information needs should be considered when constructing modular explanations. Although this analysis does not consider sophisticated human machine interfaces nor real traffic scenarios, it does show, for the first time, how satisfying statements can be generated using a planning algorithm without any human-induced bias. This is an important step towards self-contained transparency of automated driving functions and can therefore lay the basis for future human machine interfaces.
自动驾驶汽车如何解释它们的驾驶决定?自动生成澄清摘要
提高用户对自动驾驶汽车接受度的一种方法是解释他们的驾驶决定,但目前的方法仍然需要人工解释,因此容易出错。因此,该方法通过从规划算法中自动提取所有必要的信息,从而制定出明确自动驾驶车辆驾驶决策的摘要。本文展示了三种典型语句类型的生成,并通过调查用户偏好的在线调查对其进行验证。结果表明,参与者更喜欢描述影响驾驶决策的信息以及适用的交通规则的陈述。此外,在构建模块化解释时应考虑个人信息需求。虽然这一分析没有考虑复杂的人机界面和真实的交通场景,但它确实首次展示了如何使用规划算法生成令人满意的语句,而不会产生任何人为的偏见。这是向自动驾驶功能的自包含透明性迈出的重要一步,因此可以为未来的人机界面奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信