Geomechanical Model of a Gas Field for Seismic Risk Analysis

C. Berentsen, C. D. Pater, F. Nieuwland
{"title":"Geomechanical Model of a Gas Field for Seismic Risk Analysis","authors":"C. Berentsen, C. D. Pater, F. Nieuwland","doi":"10.2118/195442-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Slootdorp field has a complex structure with most reserves in Rotliegend sandstone, which is communicating with gas bearing Zechstein carbonates. The Rotliegend reservoir is bounded by a large fault, which might become seismogenic during depletion. A 3D geomechanical model was built, based on the faults and horizons in the geological model. Both the Rotliegend and Zechstein reservoirs were included in the model. The model was populated with geomechanical properties derived from logs, LOT's (leak off tests) and regional data on the stress field. Also, overburden properties from previous studies on nearby fields were used.\n The pressure input was obtained from reservoir simulation. It is important to include the water leg pressure in the pressure input since the Rotliegend gas reservoir is in contact with an active aquifer. Pressure reduction drives the compaction of the reservoir, which induces stresses on the faults causing slippage. Since the water is quite incompressible, a large pressure reduction in the water leg may be caused temporarily by a rising gas water contact.\n It turned out that slippage is not expected at the lowest gas pressure using a conservative estimate of the critical friction coefficient on the fault of 0.55. Sensitivity analysis on the most important input parameters was performed with a range that can be expected for such a field. The result was that the maximum critical stress ratio could range between 0.46 and 0.53 for the expected uncertainty of input parameters. The geomechanical modeling shows that an active aquifer has a dominant, mitigating effect on seismic risk, which can explain why many reservoirs show no seismicity in the Netherlands, although other effects could also play a role.","PeriodicalId":103248,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, June 06, 2019","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, June 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195442-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Slootdorp field has a complex structure with most reserves in Rotliegend sandstone, which is communicating with gas bearing Zechstein carbonates. The Rotliegend reservoir is bounded by a large fault, which might become seismogenic during depletion. A 3D geomechanical model was built, based on the faults and horizons in the geological model. Both the Rotliegend and Zechstein reservoirs were included in the model. The model was populated with geomechanical properties derived from logs, LOT's (leak off tests) and regional data on the stress field. Also, overburden properties from previous studies on nearby fields were used. The pressure input was obtained from reservoir simulation. It is important to include the water leg pressure in the pressure input since the Rotliegend gas reservoir is in contact with an active aquifer. Pressure reduction drives the compaction of the reservoir, which induces stresses on the faults causing slippage. Since the water is quite incompressible, a large pressure reduction in the water leg may be caused temporarily by a rising gas water contact. It turned out that slippage is not expected at the lowest gas pressure using a conservative estimate of the critical friction coefficient on the fault of 0.55. Sensitivity analysis on the most important input parameters was performed with a range that can be expected for such a field. The result was that the maximum critical stress ratio could range between 0.46 and 0.53 for the expected uncertainty of input parameters. The geomechanical modeling shows that an active aquifer has a dominant, mitigating effect on seismic risk, which can explain why many reservoirs show no seismicity in the Netherlands, although other effects could also play a role.
用于地震危险性分析的气田地质力学模型
Slootdorp油田结构复杂,大部分储量位于Rotliegend砂岩中,与含气的Zechstein碳酸盐岩相通。罗特列根德油藏被一个大断层所包围,该断层在衰竭过程中可能会发生地震。基于地质模型中的断层和层位,建立了三维地质力学模型。Rotliegend和Zechstein油藏都包括在模型中。该模型中填充了来自测井、LOT(泄漏测试)和应力场区域数据的地质力学特性。此外,还利用了以前在附近油田研究的覆盖层特性。压力输入通过油藏模拟得到。由于Rotliegend气藏与活动含水层接触,因此在压力输入中考虑水腿压力是很重要的。压力降低导致储层压实,压实作用在断层上,导致断层滑动。由于水是相当不可压缩的,气水接触的上升可能会暂时造成水腿中的压力大幅下降。结果表明,在最低的气体压力下,使用0.55的临界摩擦系数的保守估计,预计不会出现滑移。对最重要的输入参数进行了敏感性分析,其范围可以预期为此类领域。结果表明,对于输入参数的预期不确定性,最大临界应力比可在0.46 ~ 0.53之间。地质力学模型显示,活跃的含水层对地震风险具有主要的缓解作用,这可以解释为什么荷兰的许多水库没有地震活动,尽管其他影响也可能起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信