Comparative Study between Stapled and Excision Haemorrhoidectomy for the Treatment of Haemorrhoids

Mowla G, Chowdhury JM, Rahman S, Munim MI, Ahmed J
{"title":"Comparative Study between Stapled and Excision Haemorrhoidectomy for the Treatment of Haemorrhoids","authors":"Mowla G, Chowdhury JM, Rahman S, Munim MI, Ahmed J","doi":"10.47648/jswmc2022v1201-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There are different techniques for the treatment of hemorrhoidal diseases. Stapled haemrrhoidectomy is one of the modern technique which has shown little postoperative pain, less hospital stay and early go back to work. This study has been done to compare stapled haemorrhoidectomy with conventional excision hemorrhoidectomy.\n\nMethodology: The study was done in the Department of Surgery, Women’s Medical College Hospital and different private clinics in Sylhet District, from July 2016 to December 2017.A total of 42 patients were selected fulfilling the inclusion criteria to the stapled (n=21) and openexcision (n=21) group .Those patients having any other associated anal pathology like fistula, fissure, abscess and neoplasm were excluded from the study. Lithotomy position and spinal anesthesia were chosen for all the patients. Both the procedures were evaluated on the basis of total operative time, pain scores, complications, hospital stay and go back to work.\n\nResults: The mean age of patients was similar in both groups , that is 45.02 years (SD 12.30) in the stapled group and 47.54 years (SD13.50) in the open excision group.Male patients were more affected in both the groups ( 80.9%% in the stapled and 85.7% in the open group). Operative time was significantly less in the stapled group than in the open group (P .oo1). The blood loss, pain scores and requirement of analgesics was significantly less in the stapled group (P o.oo1). Average hospital stay was 2.20 days (SD 0.62) ) in the stapled group and 3.25 days (SD 1.01 ) days in the open group( P 0.01). Patients of the stapled group returned to work earlier (8.18days [SD2.24] as compared with 18.87 days [SD5.34] in the open group [P 0.001 ]). Maximum follow-up period was 6 months.\n\nConclusions: Hemorrhoidectomy by stapled procedure is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of grade II and grade III hemorrhoidaldieases. Early discharge and return to work are possible by this procedure. Furthermore, complications are as like as that of the open technique.","PeriodicalId":407803,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47648/jswmc2022v1201-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are different techniques for the treatment of hemorrhoidal diseases. Stapled haemrrhoidectomy is one of the modern technique which has shown little postoperative pain, less hospital stay and early go back to work. This study has been done to compare stapled haemorrhoidectomy with conventional excision hemorrhoidectomy. Methodology: The study was done in the Department of Surgery, Women’s Medical College Hospital and different private clinics in Sylhet District, from July 2016 to December 2017.A total of 42 patients were selected fulfilling the inclusion criteria to the stapled (n=21) and openexcision (n=21) group .Those patients having any other associated anal pathology like fistula, fissure, abscess and neoplasm were excluded from the study. Lithotomy position and spinal anesthesia were chosen for all the patients. Both the procedures were evaluated on the basis of total operative time, pain scores, complications, hospital stay and go back to work. Results: The mean age of patients was similar in both groups , that is 45.02 years (SD 12.30) in the stapled group and 47.54 years (SD13.50) in the open excision group.Male patients were more affected in both the groups ( 80.9%% in the stapled and 85.7% in the open group). Operative time was significantly less in the stapled group than in the open group (P .oo1). The blood loss, pain scores and requirement of analgesics was significantly less in the stapled group (P o.oo1). Average hospital stay was 2.20 days (SD 0.62) ) in the stapled group and 3.25 days (SD 1.01 ) days in the open group( P 0.01). Patients of the stapled group returned to work earlier (8.18days [SD2.24] as compared with 18.87 days [SD5.34] in the open group [P 0.001 ]). Maximum follow-up period was 6 months. Conclusions: Hemorrhoidectomy by stapled procedure is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of grade II and grade III hemorrhoidaldieases. Early discharge and return to work are possible by this procedure. Furthermore, complications are as like as that of the open technique.
痔钉与切除术治疗痔疮的比较研究
介绍:治疗痔疮疾病有不同的技术。吻合器痔切除术是一种具有术后疼痛小、住院时间短、早日恢复工作等特点的现代手术技术。本研究比较了缝合痔切除术和常规切除痔切除术。方法:研究于2016年7月至2017年12月在Sylhet区妇女医学院医院外科和不同的私人诊所进行。选择符合入选标准的42例患者进入缝合组(n=21)和开放切除组(n=21),排除其他相关肛门病理如瘘、裂、脓肿和肿瘤的患者。所有患者均选择取石体位及脊髓麻醉。两种手术均以总手术时间、疼痛评分、并发症、住院时间和重返工作岗位为基础进行评估。结果:两组患者的平均年龄相近,缝合组为45.02岁(sd12.30),开放切除组为47.54岁(SD13.50)。两组患者中男性患者发生率均较高(缝合组为80.9%,开放组为85.7%)。缝合组的手术时间明显少于开放组(P . 0 1)。钉书钉组出血量、疼痛评分及镇痛药需求均显著低于钉书钉组(P < 0.05)。装订组平均住院时间为2.20天(SD 0.62),开放组平均住院时间为3.25天(SD 1.01) (P < 0.01)。缝合组患者恢复工作较早(8.18天[SD2.24],而开放组为18.87天[SD5.34]) [P 0.001]。最长随访时间为6个月。结论:钉接式痔切除术是一种安全有效的治疗II级和III级痔疮疾病的方法。通过这个程序可以使患者早日出院并重返工作岗位。此外,并发症与开放式技术相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信