La France se dévoile: revealing remnants from the age of empire

Aoife Connolly
{"title":"La France se dévoile: revealing remnants from the age of empire","authors":"Aoife Connolly","doi":"10.3828/cfc.2022.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite systematic efforts to repress memories of the colonial past in the French collective psyche, evidence of the country’s “fracture coloniale” continues to surface (Bancel et al.). This article outlines some of the ways in which remnants of this past become visible in the form of politico-legal debates and in fixations in popular culture, most notably in literature, and even within state organizations such as the army. Following an overview of these contemporary issues, the article revisits the 1989 “affaire du foulard” as a case study which encompasses ever-present concerns about the banlieues, identity, education, Islam, and memories of Algeria, and which provides a particularly useful illustration of how discourses from the age of empire are visible in France today. In considering the “affaire du foulard,” the article acknowledges the backdrop of an international focus on Islam but also examines relevant practices from the conquest of Algeria in 1830 to its War of Independence (1954-1962) as well as the crucial context of circumstances in Algeria at the time of the “affaire.” The article thereby points to “l’effet de retour” of colonial practice, whereby colonial mechanisms of power were transported back to the West (Foucault 89). Finally, the analysis turns to contemporary discussions on (un)veiling in light of President Macron’s April 2020 statement that citizens should systematically wear “un masque grand publique” as part of COVID-19 health measures. In this way, the article considers how the 2011 law stating that “Nul ne peut, dans l’espace public, porter une tenue destinée à dissimuler son visage” reconciles with representations of face coverings that evoke Republican values in the context of the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":391011,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary French Civilization: Volume 47, Issue 3","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary French Civilization: Volume 47, Issue 3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/cfc.2022.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite systematic efforts to repress memories of the colonial past in the French collective psyche, evidence of the country’s “fracture coloniale” continues to surface (Bancel et al.). This article outlines some of the ways in which remnants of this past become visible in the form of politico-legal debates and in fixations in popular culture, most notably in literature, and even within state organizations such as the army. Following an overview of these contemporary issues, the article revisits the 1989 “affaire du foulard” as a case study which encompasses ever-present concerns about the banlieues, identity, education, Islam, and memories of Algeria, and which provides a particularly useful illustration of how discourses from the age of empire are visible in France today. In considering the “affaire du foulard,” the article acknowledges the backdrop of an international focus on Islam but also examines relevant practices from the conquest of Algeria in 1830 to its War of Independence (1954-1962) as well as the crucial context of circumstances in Algeria at the time of the “affaire.” The article thereby points to “l’effet de retour” of colonial practice, whereby colonial mechanisms of power were transported back to the West (Foucault 89). Finally, the analysis turns to contemporary discussions on (un)veiling in light of President Macron’s April 2020 statement that citizens should systematically wear “un masque grand publique” as part of COVID-19 health measures. In this way, the article considers how the 2011 law stating that “Nul ne peut, dans l’espace public, porter une tenue destinée à dissimuler son visage” reconciles with representations of face coverings that evoke Republican values in the context of the pandemic.
La France se damvoile:揭示帝国时代的残余
尽管有系统地努力压抑法国集体心理中的殖民历史记忆,但该国“分裂殖民”的证据仍在继续浮出水面(Bancel等人)。本文概述了过去的残余以政治法律辩论的形式和流行文化的固定形式出现的一些方式,尤其是在文学中,甚至在国家组织(如军队)中。在对这些当代问题进行概述之后,本文将1989年的“骚乱事件”作为一个案例研究,其中包含了对郊区、身份、教育、伊斯兰教和阿尔及利亚记忆的始终存在的关注,并提供了一个特别有用的例子,说明帝国时代的话语如何在今天的法国可见。在考虑“事件”时,文章承认国际社会关注伊斯兰教的背景,但也审视了从1830年征服阿尔及利亚到1954-1962年独立战争的相关做法,以及阿尔及利亚在“事件”发生时的关键背景。这篇文章由此指出了殖民实践的“回归效应”(l 'effet de retour),即殖民权力机制被运回西方(Foucault 89)。最后,根据马克龙总统2020年4月的声明,作为COVID-19卫生措施的一部分,公民应该系统地佩戴“大公共面具”,分析转向当代关于面纱的讨论。通过这种方式,文章考虑了2011年的法律规定,“没有任何公共空间,就没有任何公共空间,就没有任何公共空间,就没有任何公共空间,就没有任何公共空间”,这与在大流行背景下唤起共和党价值观的蒙面代表如何协调一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信