{"title":"Female entrants to the university of Melbourne's matriculation examination, 1871–1881","authors":"C. Hooper","doi":"10.1080/17508480109556377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In September 1871, the Professorial Board of the University of Melbourne an allmale body declared it 'is a general opinion that the education of girls is distinguished from that of boys by a vagueness and flimsiness of quality.' While the Board offered no evidence to support this claim, its dismissive view of the standard of education offered to girls in Victoria was not unique. Only a few months earlier the editor of the colony's leading newspaper the Argus, had bemoaned the poor state of tuition offered in private girls' schools, and accused the proprietors of these establishments the 'talented sisterhood'of being mere 'educational pretenders'.","PeriodicalId":347655,"journal":{"name":"Melbourne Studies in Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melbourne Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480109556377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In September 1871, the Professorial Board of the University of Melbourne an allmale body declared it 'is a general opinion that the education of girls is distinguished from that of boys by a vagueness and flimsiness of quality.' While the Board offered no evidence to support this claim, its dismissive view of the standard of education offered to girls in Victoria was not unique. Only a few months earlier the editor of the colony's leading newspaper the Argus, had bemoaned the poor state of tuition offered in private girls' schools, and accused the proprietors of these establishments the 'talented sisterhood'of being mere 'educational pretenders'.
1871年9月,墨尔本大学(University of Melbourne)的教授委员会(一个全是男性的机构)宣布,“人们普遍认为,女孩的教育与男孩的教育的区别在于质量的模糊和脆弱。”虽然委员会没有提供任何证据来支持这一说法,但它对维多利亚州向女孩提供的教育标准不屑一顾的看法并不是唯一的。就在几个月前,殖民地主要报纸《阿古斯报》的编辑还对私立女子学校糟糕的学费状况表示遗憾,并指责这些学校的老板们“才华横溢的姐妹们”只不过是“教育的伪装者”。