The Evaluation of a Wizard-Based Outpatient EMR in Oral and Maxilla Facial Surgery Department From the Aspects of Documentation Time and Record Quality — A Randomized, Cross-over Study

H. Cai, Yongfeng Li, K. Hu, Yu Cao, M. Hu
{"title":"The Evaluation of a Wizard-Based Outpatient EMR in Oral and Maxilla Facial Surgery Department From the Aspects of Documentation Time and Record Quality — A Randomized, Cross-over Study","authors":"H. Cai, Yongfeng Li, K. Hu, Yu Cao, M. Hu","doi":"10.1109/ITME.2016.0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The electronic medical records(EMR) have been widely used in healthcare organizations all around the world, which is supposed having the potential to improve the efficiency in outpatient clinics. But the results about the function of EMR were controversial. We developed a Wizard-based outpatient EMR(WEMR) system dedicated to oral and maxillofacial surgery outpatient. Objective: To compare the efficiency of the Wizard-based outpatient EMR(WEMR) and the traditional keyboard character input outpatient EMR(TEMR), which was commonly used in oral and maxillofacial surgery outpatient. Methods: A well trained nurse, who was diagnosed with impacted lower third molar, acted as a standardized patient. 7 attending doctors and 21 interns were randomly allocated into two groups for EMR writing, one group writing medical records with TEMR, and the other with WEMR. And after 3 months of washout period, the writing tools were exchanged. A medical record scoring scale was produced for this standardized patient by three specialists. The documentary time and medical record quality scores of TEMR and WEMR were compared and analyzed. Results: The results showed that the documentary time decreased while the record quality score increased in WEMR group compared with TEMR group, and there were statistically difference between the two groups. At the same time, in the terms of record quality score comparison, the increase in interns group appeared to be greater than attending doctors group after using WEMR. Conclusions: The WEMR system can significantly reduce the documentary time and improve quality of medical records in outpatient of oral and maxillofacial surgery department. At the same time, the WEMR system can help the interns to master medical record writing skills.","PeriodicalId":184905,"journal":{"name":"2016 8th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 8th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITME.2016.0080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The electronic medical records(EMR) have been widely used in healthcare organizations all around the world, which is supposed having the potential to improve the efficiency in outpatient clinics. But the results about the function of EMR were controversial. We developed a Wizard-based outpatient EMR(WEMR) system dedicated to oral and maxillofacial surgery outpatient. Objective: To compare the efficiency of the Wizard-based outpatient EMR(WEMR) and the traditional keyboard character input outpatient EMR(TEMR), which was commonly used in oral and maxillofacial surgery outpatient. Methods: A well trained nurse, who was diagnosed with impacted lower third molar, acted as a standardized patient. 7 attending doctors and 21 interns were randomly allocated into two groups for EMR writing, one group writing medical records with TEMR, and the other with WEMR. And after 3 months of washout period, the writing tools were exchanged. A medical record scoring scale was produced for this standardized patient by three specialists. The documentary time and medical record quality scores of TEMR and WEMR were compared and analyzed. Results: The results showed that the documentary time decreased while the record quality score increased in WEMR group compared with TEMR group, and there were statistically difference between the two groups. At the same time, in the terms of record quality score comparison, the increase in interns group appeared to be greater than attending doctors group after using WEMR. Conclusions: The WEMR system can significantly reduce the documentary time and improve quality of medical records in outpatient of oral and maxillofacial surgery department. At the same time, the WEMR system can help the interns to master medical record writing skills.
从记录时间和记录质量两方面评价基于向导的口腔颌面外科门诊EMR——一项随机交叉研究
背景:电子病历(EMR)在世界各地的医疗机构中得到了广泛的应用,有望提高门诊诊所的效率。但关于EMR功能的研究结果存在争议。我们开发了一个基于向导的门诊EMR(WEMR)系统,专门用于口腔颌面外科门诊。目的:比较基于向导的门诊EMR(WEMR)与传统的键盘字符输入门诊EMR(TEMR)在口腔颌面外科门诊常用的效率。方法:一名训练有素的护士,诊断为下第三磨牙阻生,作为一个标准化的病人。7名主治医生和21名实习生随机分为两组,一组使用TEMR书写病历,另一组使用WEMR书写病历。3个月的洗脱期后,交换书写工具。三名专家为该标准化患者制作了病历评分量表。比较分析TEMR和WEMR的记录时间和病案质量评分。结果:与TEMR组比较,WEMR组记录时间缩短,记录质量评分提高,两组比较差异有统计学意义。同时,在病历质量评分比较方面,使用WEMR后,实习生组的提高幅度明显大于主治医生组。结论:WEMR系统可显著减少口腔颌面外科门诊病历的记录时间,提高病历质量。同时,WEMR系统可以帮助实习生掌握病案写作技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信