Recent Development and Validation of the Latest FlawPRO™ ECA Methodology

B. Bezenšek, G. Chell, C. Popelar, Meng Luo
{"title":"Recent Development and Validation of the Latest FlawPRO™ ECA Methodology","authors":"B. Bezenšek, G. Chell, C. Popelar, Meng Luo","doi":"10.1115/OMAE2018-78068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The graphical user interface driven engineering software tool FlawPRO™ has been extensively used for subsea pipeline design and installation under high strain or fatigue intense applications. The methodology included in the program has evolved since its inception in 2002 through a series of JIPs involving major oil and gas operators and installation contractors. This paper summarises the fracture mechanics concepts incorporated in the methodology of the latest version of FlawPRO™ and the results of an extensive full scale flawed pipe testing programme that included over 45 reeling simulations and other fracture tests performed to validate the methodology.\n It is shown that the program’s crack growth predictions under large strain reeling are consistent with test data obtained from reeled pipes containing centreline flaws in over-matched welds, with the majority of the predicted results obtained using average material property data scattering around the mean 1:1 line consistent with uncertainties in the mechanical property values used in the validation. The results of an assessment of some of the reeling test data using the DNV ECA methodology (DNV-RP-F108) are also presented.\n It is concluded that the FlawPRO™ methodology is consistently more accurate in assessing the test data compared with the DNV methodology which may yield some non-conservative results.\n Both methodologies require suitable factors of safety or adjustments to either material and / or load inputs to maintain conservatism in applications to the pipeline projects.","PeriodicalId":155568,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-78068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The graphical user interface driven engineering software tool FlawPRO™ has been extensively used for subsea pipeline design and installation under high strain or fatigue intense applications. The methodology included in the program has evolved since its inception in 2002 through a series of JIPs involving major oil and gas operators and installation contractors. This paper summarises the fracture mechanics concepts incorporated in the methodology of the latest version of FlawPRO™ and the results of an extensive full scale flawed pipe testing programme that included over 45 reeling simulations and other fracture tests performed to validate the methodology. It is shown that the program’s crack growth predictions under large strain reeling are consistent with test data obtained from reeled pipes containing centreline flaws in over-matched welds, with the majority of the predicted results obtained using average material property data scattering around the mean 1:1 line consistent with uncertainties in the mechanical property values used in the validation. The results of an assessment of some of the reeling test data using the DNV ECA methodology (DNV-RP-F108) are also presented. It is concluded that the FlawPRO™ methodology is consistently more accurate in assessing the test data compared with the DNV methodology which may yield some non-conservative results. Both methodologies require suitable factors of safety or adjustments to either material and / or load inputs to maintain conservatism in applications to the pipeline projects.
最新的blackpro™ECA方法的最新开发和验证
图形用户界面驱动的工程软件工具FlawPRO已广泛用于高应变或高疲劳强度应用下的海底管道设计和安装。该项目自2002年启动以来,通过一系列涉及主要油气运营商和安装承包商的JIPs,其方法不断发展。本文总结了最新版本的FlawPRO™方法中包含的断裂力学概念,以及广泛的全尺寸缺陷管测试程序的结果,包括超过45次的弯曲模拟和其他断裂测试,以验证该方法。结果表明,该程序在大应变卷取下的裂纹扩展预测与在过度匹配焊缝中包含中心线缺陷的卷取管中获得的测试数据一致,并且大多数预测结果是使用平均材料性能数据在平均1:1线周围散射获得的,这与验证中使用的力学性能值的不确定性一致。本文还介绍了使用DNV ECA方法(DNV- rp - f108)对一些摇尾试验数据进行评估的结果。结论是,与DNV方法相比,该方法在评估测试数据方面始终更加准确,DNV方法可能会产生一些非保守的结果。这两种方法都需要适当的安全因素或调整材料和/或负载输入,以保持管道项目应用中的稳定期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信